MDYV vs. EQRR
MDYV (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF) and EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - MDYV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while EQRR tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDYV returned 7.48%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for EQRR. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQRR.
Performance
MDYV vs. EQRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than EQRR's 27.33% return.
MDYV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
EQRR
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 27.33%
- 6M
- 27.15%
- 1Y
- 41.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- —
MDYV vs. EQRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 9.04% | 7.45% | 11.48% | 15.35% | -7.19% | 30.51% | 3.68% | 25.89% | -11.95% | 5.82% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 27.33% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -10.14% | 19.57% | -18.60% | 15.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYV and EQRR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MDYV and EQRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDYV vs. EQRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDYV
EQRR
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
MDYV
EQRR
Industrials
MDYV
EQRR
Consumer Cyclical
MDYV
EQRR
Real Estate
MDYV
EQRR
-
Technology
MDYV
EQRR
Energy
MDYV
EQRR
Basic Materials
MDYV
EQRR
-
Consumer Defensive
MDYV
EQRR
-
Utilities
MDYV
EQRR
-
Healthcare
MDYV
EQRR
-
Communication Services
MDYV
EQRR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDYV vs. EQRR — Risk / Return Rank
MDYV
EQRR
MDYV vs. EQRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDYV | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.56 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 8.47 | -6.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | 31.54 | -24.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDYV | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 3.11 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.58 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.43 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
MDYV vs. EQRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, roughly equal to the maximum EQRR drawdown of -57.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and EQRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYV | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.71% | -57.93% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -4.95% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -17.75% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -21.75% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.58% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -10.08% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 1.33% | +1.73% |
Volatility
MDYV vs. EQRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) is 3.93%, while ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that MDYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDYV | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 4.72% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 10.35% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.25% | 13.50% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 21.39% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 24.87% | -2.97% |
MDYV vs. EQRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EQRR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDYV vs. EQRR - Dividend Comparison
MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than EQRR's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.20% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.28% | 2.48% | 1.83% | 4.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDYV and EQRR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQRR has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to MDYV (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs EQRR's -57.93%.
On 5-year performance, EQRR leads with 12.33% vs 7.48% for MDYV. On fees, MDYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQRR.
MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.20% for EQRR.
MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while EQRR tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.35% for EQRR.
EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDYV and EQRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer