PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYV vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYV vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYV has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 10.40%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.


MDYV

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.78%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.24%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.40%

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYV vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
9.04%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%12.31%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYV and BIL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYV vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYV vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDYVBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-172.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

87.91

-86.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

355.35

-353.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

2,817.77

-2,810.99

MDYV vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYV and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDYVBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

19.71

-18.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

13.16

-12.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

8.52

-8.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

2.78

-2.36

Drawdowns

MDYV vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYVBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.71%

-0.78%

-59.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-0.01%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-0.01%

-22.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-0.10%

-22.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

-0.21%

-45.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

0.00%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-0.26%

-8.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

0.00%

+3.06%

Volatility

MDYV vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that MDYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYVBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

0.05%

+3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

0.13%

+10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

0.20%

+15.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

0.26%

+19.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

0.26%

+21.64%

MDYV vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDYV vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDYV and BIL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDYV has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 10-year performance, MDYV leads with 10.40% vs 2.18% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MDYV has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 1.73% for MDYV.

MDYV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYV and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer