MDYG vs. SPYM
MDYG (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDYG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDYG returned 11.58%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for SPYM. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
MDYG vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDYG achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 11.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYG has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 11.58%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.
MDYG
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- 1Y
- 30.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
SPYM
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 28.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- 13.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
MDYG vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 19.44% | 7.22% | 15.84% | 17.30% | -18.92% | 18.46% | 22.57% | 26.10% | -10.46% | 19.61% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 11.36% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYG and SPYM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005 | 0.80 |
The correlation between MDYG and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDYG vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDYG
SPYM
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDYG
SPYM
Technology
MDYG
SPYM
Healthcare
MDYG
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
MDYG
SPYM
Financial Services
MDYG
SPYM
Real Estate
MDYG
SPYM
Energy
MDYG
SPYM
Basic Materials
MDYG
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
MDYG
SPYM
Utilities
MDYG
SPYM
Communication Services
MDYG
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDYG vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
MDYG
SPYM
MDYG vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDYG | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.23 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 15.02 | -2.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDYG | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.44 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.84 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.87 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.62 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
MDYG vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYG | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.44% | -54.46% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -8.90% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.45% | -18.72% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.26% | -24.48% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.27% | -33.87% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -7.15% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 1.91% | +0.56% |
Volatility
MDYG vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.78%. This indicates that MDYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDYG | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 2.78% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.21% | 8.91% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 11.79% | +5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 16.80% | +3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 18.00% | +3.05% |
MDYG vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDYG vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than SPYM's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.75% | 0.87% | 1.20% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.51% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDYG and SPYM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDYG has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to SPYM (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYG dropped -58.44% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.57% vs 11.58% for MDYG. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYG.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.61% for MDYG.
MDYG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYG and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDYG and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer