MDYG vs. FCUS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MDYG (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF) and FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. MDYG is passively managed, while FCUS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MDYG returned 18.49%/yr vs 36.53%/yr for FCUS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FCUS.

Performance

MDYG vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYG achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than FCUS's 47.20% return.

MDYG

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 4.57%
• YTD: 19.44%
• 6M: 18.73%
• 1Y: 30.20%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 8.66%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

FCUS

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 5.82%
• YTD: 47.20%
• 6M: 47.58%
• 1Y: 92.36%
• 3Y*: 36.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYG vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF	19.44%	7.22%	15.84%	17.30%
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	47.20%	13.69%	30.59%	21.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYG and FCUS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2023	0.74

The correlation between MDYG and FCUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDYG vs. FCUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MDYG	FCUS
Industrials	30.9%	15.3%
Technology	21.5%	40.7%
Healthcare	13.7%	6.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	2.9%
Financial Services	7.1%	-
Real Estate	5.6%	-
Energy	3.7%	18.2%
Basic Materials	3.7%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	4.4%
Utilities	2.0%	-
Communication Services	1.5%	2.2%

Return for Risk

MDYG vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYG

MDYG Risk / Return Rank: 58
MDYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MDYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MDYG Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MDYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
MDYG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 80
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYG vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDYG	FCUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.73	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	3.04	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.43	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	5.25	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.24	18.78	-6.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDYG vs. FCUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the FCUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYG and FCUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDYG	FCUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	2.73	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	1.10	-0.62

Drawdowns

MDYG vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than FCUS's maximum drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and FCUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDYG	FCUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.44%	-39.89%	-18.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.91%	-17.70%	+7.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.45%	-39.89%	+14.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.91%	+1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.03%	-7.54%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	4.94%	-2.47%

Volatility

MDYG vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) is 5.08%, while Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a volatility of 10.15%. This indicates that MDYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDYG	FCUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	10.15%	-5.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.21%	25.47%	-12.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	33.99%	-16.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.62%	29.98%	-9.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	29.98%	-8.93%

MDYG vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDYG vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison

MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than FCUS's 2.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	2.94%	4.33%	11.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF	0.61%	0.75%	0.87%	1.20%	1.16%	0.69%	0.71%	1.21%	1.36%	2.23%	1.25%	2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDYG and FCUS in my portfolio?

MDYG and FCUS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDYG or FCUS?

FCUS has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to MDYG (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYG dropped -58.44% vs FCUS's -39.89%.

Which ETF is better, MDYG or FCUS?

On 3-year performance, FCUS leads with 36.53% vs 18.49% for MDYG. On fees, MDYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MDYG or FCUS?

Over the 3-year period, FCUS has performed better with a 36.53% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDYG or FCUS?

MDYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDYG or FCUS?

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.61% for MDYG.

What is the main difference between MDYG and FCUS?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pinnacle. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYG and 0.79% for FCUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.