MDY vs. FSGS
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS).
MDY and FSGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 4, 1995. FSGS is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the SMID Growth Strength Index. It was launched on Jun 20, 2017. Both MDY and FSGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MDY vs. FSGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDY vs. FSGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 3.32% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 10.24% |
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | -3.16% | 2.41% | 6.38% | 15.98% | -13.17% | 25.56% | 10.26% | 21.31% | -11.92% | 10.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly higher than FSGS's -3.16% return.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 4.62%
- 1Y
- 17.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
FSGS
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -3.16%
- 6M
- -5.05%
- 1Y
- 6.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDY vs. FSGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FSGS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. FSGS — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
FSGS
MDY vs. FSGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDY | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.34 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 0.65 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.08 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 0.66 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 1.99 | +3.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDY | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.34 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.12 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.28 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and FSGS is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDY vs. FSGS - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while FSGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.15% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.71% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 1.35% | 1.32% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MDY vs. FSGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, which is greater than FSGS's maximum drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and FSGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -43.26% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.07% | -11.84% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -24.08% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.36% | -8.90% | +3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -8.08% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.92% | -0.63% |
Volatility
MDY vs. FSGS - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) at 5.52%. This indicates that MDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | FSGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 5.52% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | 11.37% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.11% | 19.92% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 20.16% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 22.94% | -1.77% |