MDY vs. CTEF
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. MDY is passively managed, while CTEF is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
MDY vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.80% return.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 14.32%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 25.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
CTEF
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 8.48%
- YTD
- 29.80%
- 6M
- 30.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDY vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 14.32% | 9.91% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.80% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and CTEF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
CTEF
MDY vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDY | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDY | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 3.56 | -3.03 |
Drawdowns
MDY vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -15.00% | -40.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.06% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -1.79% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | — | — |
Volatility
MDY vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 21.76% | -6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 21.76% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 21.76% | -0.57% |
MDY vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDY vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDY and CTEF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MDY is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MDY is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.
MDY has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for MDY and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer