MDY vs. BMVP
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - MDY tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index while BMVP tracks the Bloomberg MVP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 10.98%/yr vs 9.43%/yr for BMVP. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BMVP.
Performance
MDY vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly higher than BMVP's 6.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has outperformed BMVP with an annualized return of 10.98%, while BMVP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.43% annualized return.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 14.32%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 25.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
BMVP
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 10.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
MDY vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 14.32% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 6.62% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -6.40% | 20.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and BMVP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2003 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MDY and BMVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MDY vs. BMVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
BMVP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
BMVP
Technology
MDY
BMVP
Financial Services
MDY
BMVP
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
BMVP
Healthcare
MDY
BMVP
Real Estate
MDY
BMVP
Energy
MDY
BMVP
Basic Materials
MDY
BMVP
Consumer Defensive
MDY
BMVP
Utilities
MDY
BMVP
Communication Services
MDY
BMVP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
BMVP
MDY vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDY | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.18 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 1.56 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | 4.78 | +5.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDY | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.03 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.39 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.50 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.11 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
MDY vs. BMVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum BMVP drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and BMVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -78.13% | +22.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -6.45% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -15.12% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -26.58% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -39.45% | -2.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.65% | +1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -36.20% | +29.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.10% | +0.32% |
Volatility
MDY vs. BMVP - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) at 2.26%. This indicates that MDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 2.26% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | 7.21% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 9.77% | +5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 16.07% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 18.81% | +2.38% |
MDY vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDY vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than BMVP's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 1.67% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDY and BMVP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDY has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to BMVP (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs BMVP's -78.13%.
On 10-year performance, MDY leads with 10.98% vs 9.43% for BMVP. On fees, MDY is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MDY has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDY is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BMVP.
BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.04% for MDY.
MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.29% for BMVP.
MDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and BMVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer