MDXG vs. PR
MDXG (MiMedx Group, Inc.) and PR (Permian Resources Corporation) are both stocks. MDXG operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while PR operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 3 years, MDXG returned -15.95%/yr vs 27.53%/yr for PR. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDXG vs. PR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDXG achieves a -43.43% return, which is significantly lower than PR's 35.55% return.
MDXG
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- 5.80%
- YTD
- -43.43%
- 6M
- -45.90%
- 1Y
- -35.74%
- 3Y*
- -15.95%
- 5Y*
- -19.40%
- 10Y*
- -6.59%
PR
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- 35.55%
- 6M
- 37.02%
- 1Y
- 38.79%
- 3Y*
- 27.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDXG vs. PR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDXG MiMedx Group, Inc. | -43.43% | -29.63% | 9.69% | 215.47% | -21.25% |
PR Permian Resources Corporation | 35.55% | 1.89% | 11.66% | 49.42% | 16.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDXG and PR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2022 | 0.15 |
The correlation between MDXG and PR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MDXG:
$568.55M
PR:
$15.48B
MDXG:
$0.21
PR:
$0.85
MDXG:
18.63
PR:
22.00
MDXG:
0.00
PR:
0.36
MDXG:
1.47
PR:
3.87
MDXG:
2.34
PR:
1.37
MDXG:
$389.42M
PR:
$3.69B
MDXG:
$315.59M
PR:
$1.20B
MDXG:
$53.81M
PR:
$3.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDXG vs. PR — Risk / Return Rank
MDXG
PR
MDXG vs. PR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) and Permian Resources Corporation (PR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDXG | PR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.20 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 2.23 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 5.26 | -6.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDXG vs. PR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDXG drawdown since its inception was -93.83%, which is greater than PR's maximum drawdown of -39.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDXG and PR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDXG | PR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.83% | -39.39% | -54.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.24% | -17.46% | -43.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.36% | -39.39% | -28.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.67% | -16.25% | -62.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.57% | -12.53% | -41.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.47% | 7.39% | +25.08% |
Volatility
MDXG vs. PR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) is 8.78%, while Permian Resources Corporation (PR) has a volatility of 10.40%. This indicates that MDXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDXG | PR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.78% | 10.40% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.60% | 23.80% | +6.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.91% | 33.56% | +9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 42.23% | +19.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.92% | 42.23% | +31.69% |
Dividends
MDXG vs. PR - Dividend Comparison
MDXG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDXG MiMedx Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PR Permian Resources Corporation | 3.32% | 4.28% | 5.91% | 2.72% | 0.53% |
Financials
MDXG vs. PR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MiMedx Group, Inc. and Permian Resources Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MDXG and PR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PR has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to MDXG (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDXG dropped -93.83% vs PR's -39.39%.
PR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDXG and PR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer