PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDXG vs. TNGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDXG vs. TNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) and Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDXG achieves a -47.27% return, which is significantly lower than TNGX's 142.66% return.


MDXG

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
-47.27%
6M
-46.88%
1Y
-44.13%
3Y*
-14.84%
5Y*
-19.16%
10Y*
-7.99%

TNGX

1D
-6.93%
1M
2.48%
YTD
142.66%
6M
113.29%
1Y
746.46%
3Y*
88.89%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDXG vs. TNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.
-47.27%-29.63%9.69%215.47%-53.97%-33.48%37.58%
TNGX
Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
142.66%186.73%-68.79%36.55%-33.73%-4.37%11.83%

Correlation

The correlation between MDXG and TNGX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020

0.23

The correlation between MDXG and TNGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDXG:

$529.95M

TNGX:

$3.09B

EPS

MDXG:

$0.21

TNGX:

-$0.89

PS Ratio

MDXG:

1.37

TNGX:

45.39

PB Ratio

MDXG:

2.18

TNGX:

7.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDXG:

$389.42M

TNGX:

$56.99M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDXG:

$315.59M

TNGX:

$55.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

MDXG:

$53.81M

TNGX:

-$111.92M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDXG vs. TNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDXG
MDXG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MDXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDXG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MDXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDXG Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TNGX
TNGX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDXG vs. TNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) and Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDXGTNGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.04

8.28

-9.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.56

5.67

-7.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.70

-0.89

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

29.70

-30.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.49

79.51

-81.01

MDXG vs. TNGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDXG Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the TNGX Sharpe Ratio of 8.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDXG and TNGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDXGTNGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

8.28

-9.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

0.15

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.15

-0.09

Drawdowns

MDXG vs. TNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDXG drawdown since its inception was -93.83%, roughly equal to the maximum TNGX drawdown of -93.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDXG and TNGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDXGTNGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.83%

-93.64%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.24%

-29.24%

-32.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.36%

-91.46%

+23.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.39%

-93.64%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.12%

-22.58%

-57.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.50%

-48.22%

-5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.79%

10.92%

+18.87%

Volatility

MDXG vs. TNGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) is 8.66%, while Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) has a volatility of 28.86%. This indicates that MDXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDXGTNGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.66%

28.86%

-20.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.99%

64.74%

-33.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.76%

92.04%

-49.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.11%

99.00%

-36.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.92%

93.56%

-19.64%

Dividends

MDXG vs. TNGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MDXG nor TNGX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MDXG vs. TNGX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MiMedx Group, Inc. and Tango Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M20222023202420252026
58.99M
0
(MDXG) Total Revenue
(TNGX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MDXG and TNGX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNGX has higher volatility (28.86%) compared to MDXG (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDXG dropped -93.83% vs TNGX's -93.64%.

TNGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.28 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDXG and TNGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer