PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDXG vs. LNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDXG vs. LNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) and Lincoln National Corporation (LNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDXG achieves a -45.79% return, which is significantly lower than LNC's -13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MDXG has underperformed LNC with an annualized return of -6.98%, while LNC has yielded a comparatively higher 3.69% annualized return.


MDXG

1D
0.00%
1M
1.38%
YTD
-45.79%
6M
-47.87%
1Y
-36.83%
3Y*
-17.14%
5Y*
-19.80%
10Y*
-6.98%

LNC

1D
1.37%
1M
4.58%
YTD
-13.39%
6M
-16.41%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
23.49%
5Y*
-4.86%
10Y*
3.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDXG vs. LNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.
-45.79%-29.63%9.69%215.47%-53.97%-33.48%19.79%323.46%-85.80%42.33%
LNC
Lincoln National Corporation
-13.39%48.02%24.78%-5.55%-53.53%39.49%-11.08%17.95%-31.98%17.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MDXG and LNC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2007

0.17

The correlation between MDXG and LNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MDXG:

$0.21

LNC:

$12.09

PE Ratio

MDXG:

17.85

LNC:

3.12

PEG Ratio

MDXG:

0.00

LNC:

0.02

PS Ratio

MDXG:

1.41

LNC:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDXG:

$389.42M

LNC:

$18.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDXG:

$315.59M

LNC:

$3.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

MDXG:

$53.81M

LNC:

$2.45B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDXG vs. LNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDXG
MDXG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MDXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDXG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MDXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDXG Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LNC
LNC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDXG vs. LNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) and Lincoln National Corporation (LNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDXGLNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.13

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

0.68

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

1.43

-2.57

MDXG vs. LNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDXG Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the LNC Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDXG and LNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDXG vs. LNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDXG drawdown since its inception was -93.83%, roughly equal to the maximum LNC drawdown of -92.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDXG and LNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDXGLNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.83%

-92.87%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.24%

-29.13%

-32.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.36%

-29.13%

-39.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.39%

-73.14%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.60%

-79.19%

-14.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.57%

-37.74%

-41.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.56%

-25.06%

-28.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.14%

13.88%

+18.26%

Volatility

MDXG vs. LNC - Volatility Comparison

MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) at 7.13%. This indicates that MDXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDXGLNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.64%

7.13%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.57%

25.00%

+5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.94%

33.41%

+9.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.94%

42.83%

+19.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.95%

46.77%

+27.18%

Dividends

MDXG vs. LNC - Dividend Comparison

MDXG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LNC
Lincoln National Corporation
4.78%4.04%5.68%6.67%5.86%2.46%3.18%2.51%2.57%1.51%1.51%1.59%
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MDXG vs. LNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MiMedx Group, Inc. and Lincoln National Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
58.99M
5.31B
(MDXG) Total Revenue
(LNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MDXG vs. LNC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MiMedx Group, Inc. and Lincoln National Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
70.6%
0
Portfolio components
MDXG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MiMedx Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.62M and revenue of 58.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.6%.

LNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln National Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MDXG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MiMedx Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -16.05M and revenue of 58.99M, resulting in an operating margin of -27.2%.

LNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln National Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 5.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MDXG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MiMedx Group, Inc. reported a net income of -10.86M and revenue of 58.99M, resulting in a net margin of -18.4%.

LNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln National Corporation reported a net income of -172.00M and revenue of 5.31B, resulting in a net margin of -3.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MDXG and LNC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDXG has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to LNC (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDXG dropped -93.83% vs LNC's -92.87%.

LNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDXG and LNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer