LNC vs. PFG
LNC (Lincoln National Corporation) and PFG (Principal Financial Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — LNC in Insurance - Life, PFG in Insurance - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, LNC returned 4.62%/yr vs 13.79%/yr for PFG. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
LNC vs. PFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNC achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly lower than PFG's 31.09% return. Over the past 10 years, LNC has underperformed PFG with an annualized return of 4.62%, while PFG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.79% annualized return.
LNC
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 24.69%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 23.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.85%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.44%
PFG
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 22.08%
- YTD
- 31.09%
- 1Y
- 56.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.95%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $104.93M | $89.04M | $74.21M | |
| $225.05M | $182.69M | $150.91M |
LNC vs. PFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 6.05% | 48.02% | 24.78% | -5.55% | -53.53% | 39.49% | -11.08% | 17.95% | -31.98% | 17.98% |
PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 31.09% | 18.38% | 1.87% | -2.83% | 20.10% | 51.35% | -5.19% | 29.71% | -34.96% | 25.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNC and PFG is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2001 | 0.75 |
The correlation between LNC and PFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LNC:
$8.72B
PFG:
$24.40B
LNC:
$16.08
PFG:
$6.97
LNC:
2.84
PFG:
16.31
LNC:
0.02
PFG:
0.24
LNC:
0.35
PFG:
1.61
LNC:
$19.36B
PFG:
$15.69B
LNC:
$6.59B
PFG:
$7.62B
LNC:
$1.43B
PFG:
$1.90B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNC vs. PFG — Risk / Return Rank
LNC
PFG
LNC vs. PFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) and Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNC | PFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.39 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 4.32 | -3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | 14.79 | -13.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNC vs. PFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNC drawdown since its inception was -92.87%, roughly equal to the maximum PFG drawdown of -91.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNC and PFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNC | PFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.87% | -91.50% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.13% | -11.96% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.13% | -22.43% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.14% | -29.32% | -43.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.19% | -64.73% | -14.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.77% | -0.34% | -23.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.08% | -21.73% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.53% | 3.51% | +11.02% |
Volatility
LNC vs. PFG - Volatility Comparison
Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) has a higher volatility of 13.12% compared to Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) at 6.12%. This indicates that LNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNC | PFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.12% | 6.12% | +7.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.01% | 16.34% | +11.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.83% | 22.09% | +13.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.99% | 26.48% | +16.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.64% | 31.73% | +14.91% |
Dividends
LNC vs. PFG - Dividend Comparison
LNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than PFG's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 3.95% | 4.04% | 5.68% | 6.67% | 5.86% | 2.46% | 3.18% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.59% |
PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 2.81% | 3.49% | 3.68% | 3.30% | 3.05% | 3.37% | 4.52% | 3.96% | 4.75% | 2.65% | 2.78% | 3.33% |
Financials
LNC vs. PFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln National Corporation and Principal Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNC vs. PFG - Profitability Comparison
LNC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln National Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Principal Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.91B and revenue of 3.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
LNC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln National Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
PFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Principal Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 496.30M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.
LNC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln National Corporation reported a net income of 1.33B and revenue of 4.54B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.
PFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Principal Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 403.40M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNC and PFG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNC has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to PFG (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNC dropped -92.87% vs PFG's -91.50%.
PFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNC and PFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer