LNC vs. ICE
LNC (Lincoln National Corporation) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — LNC in Insurance - Life, ICE in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges. Over the past 10 years, LNC returned 4.62%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for ICE. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LNC vs. ICE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNC achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly higher than ICE's -5.20% return. Over the past 10 years, LNC has underperformed ICE with an annualized return of 4.62%, while ICE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.62% annualized return.
LNC
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 24.69%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 23.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.85%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.44%
ICE
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- 14.66%
- 6M
- -11.65%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 1Y
- -16.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $688.42M | $623.20M | $636.51M | |
| $104.93M | $89.04M | $74.21M |
LNC vs. ICE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 6.05% | 48.02% | 24.78% | -5.55% | -53.53% | 39.49% | -11.08% | 17.95% | -31.98% | 17.98% |
ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | -5.20% | 9.92% | 17.46% | 27.12% | -23.91% | 19.94% | 26.15% | 24.47% | 8.11% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNC and ICE is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005 | 0.40 |
Fundamentals
LNC:
$8.72B
ICE:
$85.99B
LNC:
$16.08
ICE:
$7.06
LNC:
2.84
ICE:
21.59
LNC:
0.02
ICE:
2.61
LNC:
0.35
ICE:
6.48
LNC:
$19.36B
ICE:
$13.42B
LNC:
$6.59B
ICE:
$10.01B
LNC:
$1.43B
ICE:
$6.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNC vs. ICE — Risk / Return Rank
LNC
ICE
LNC vs. ICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNC | ICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.90 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | -0.49 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | -0.99 | +2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNC vs. ICE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNC drawdown since its inception was -92.87%, which is greater than ICE's maximum drawdown of -73.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNC and ICE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNC | ICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.87% | -73.94% | -18.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.13% | -33.94% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.13% | -33.94% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.14% | -34.32% | -38.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.19% | -34.32% | -44.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.77% | -18.05% | -5.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.08% | -16.52% | -8.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.53% | 16.71% | -2.18% |
Volatility
LNC vs. ICE - Volatility Comparison
Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) has a higher volatility of 13.12% compared to Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) at 7.90%. This indicates that LNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNC | ICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.12% | 7.90% | +5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.01% | 20.61% | +7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.83% | 24.53% | +11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.99% | 21.65% | +21.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.64% | 22.42% | +24.22% |
Dividends
LNC vs. ICE - Dividend Comparison
LNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than ICE's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 1.31% | 1.19% | 1.21% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 1.13% | 1.21% | 1.13% |
LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 3.95% | 4.04% | 5.68% | 6.67% | 5.86% | 2.46% | 3.18% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.59% |
Financials
LNC vs. ICE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln National Corporation and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNC vs. ICE - Profitability Comparison
LNC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln National Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.82B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.
LNC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln National Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.5%.
LNC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln National Corporation reported a net income of 1.33B and revenue of 4.54B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.
ICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 958.00M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNC and ICE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNC has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to ICE (7.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNC dropped -92.87% vs ICE's -73.94%.
LNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNC and ICE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer