PortfoliosLab logo
LNC vs. ICE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LNC and ICE is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LNC vs. ICE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNC:

0.52

ICE:

1.62

Sortino Ratio

LNC:

1.01

ICE:

2.26

Omega Ratio

LNC:

1.14

ICE:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

LNC:

0.40

ICE:

2.30

Martin Ratio

LNC:

2.32

ICE:

6.66

Ulcer Index

LNC:

9.72%

ICE:

4.91%

Daily Std Dev

LNC:

41.04%

ICE:

18.66%

Max Drawdown

LNC:

-92.87%

ICE:

-73.94%

Current Drawdown

LNC:

-45.74%

ICE:

-1.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNC:

$5.88B

ICE:

$101.10B

EPS

LNC:

$7.07

ICE:

$4.83

PE Ratio

LNC:

4.87

ICE:

36.49

PEG Ratio

LNC:

1.24

ICE:

2.52

PS Ratio

LNC:

0.32

ICE:

10.69

PB Ratio

LNC:

0.81

ICE:

3.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNC:

$18.78B

ICE:

$12.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNC:

-$335.00M

ICE:

$6.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNC:

$1.54B

ICE:

$6.14B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNC achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly lower than ICE's 18.61% return. Over the past 10 years, LNC has underperformed ICE with an annualized return of -1.86%, while ICE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


LNC

YTD

11.72%

1M

13.71%

6M

0.22%

1Y

20.51%

5Y*

3.85%

10Y*

-1.86%

ICE

YTD

18.61%

1M

11.10%

6M

13.96%

1Y

28.86%

5Y*

14.44%

10Y*

15.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNC vs. ICE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNC is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNC is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNC is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNC is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNC is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ICE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICE is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICE is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICE is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICE is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICE is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICE is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LNC vs. ICE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LNC Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the ICE Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNC and ICE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LNC vs. ICE - Dividend Comparison

LNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than ICE's 1.04% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LNC
Lincoln National Corporation
5.23%5.68%6.67%5.86%2.46%3.18%2.51%2.57%1.51%1.51%1.59%1.11%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
1.04%1.21%1.31%1.48%0.97%1.04%1.19%1.27%1.13%1.21%1.13%1.19%

Drawdowns

LNC vs. ICE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNC drawdown since its inception was -92.87%, which is greater than ICE's maximum drawdown of -73.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNC and ICE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LNC vs. ICE - Volatility Comparison

Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) at 6.26%. This indicates that LNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LNC vs. ICE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln National Corporation and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
4.69B
3.23B
(LNC) Total Revenue
(ICE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LNC vs. ICE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lincoln National Corporation and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
-1.7%
55.1%
(LNC) Gross Margin
(ICE) Gross Margin
LNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln National Corporation reported a gross profit of -80.00M and revenue of 4.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.7%.

ICE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 3.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.1%.

LNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln National Corporation reported an operating income of -949.00M and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in an operating margin of -20.2%.

ICE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.8%.

LNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln National Corporation reported a net income of -722.00M and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in a net margin of -15.4%.

ICE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 797.00M and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.