LNC vs. CB
Compare and contrast key facts about Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) and Chubb Limited (CB).
Performance
LNC vs. CB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LNC vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNC Lincoln National Corporation | -19.45% | 48.02% | 24.78% | -5.55% | -53.53% | 39.49% | -11.08% | 17.95% | -31.98% | 17.98% |
CB Chubb Limited | 4.73% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
Fundamentals
LNC:
$9.41
CB:
$25.61
LNC:
3.77
CB:
12.73
LNC:
0.02
CB:
0.85
LNC:
0.24
CB:
2.81
LNC:
$18.21B
CB:
$46.59B
LNC:
$661.00M
CB:
$12.47B
LNC:
$582.00M
CB:
$10.09B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNC achieves a -19.45% return, which is significantly lower than CB's 4.73% return. Over the past 10 years, LNC has underperformed CB with an annualized return of 2.66%, while CB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.
LNC
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- -19.45%
- 6M
- -10.05%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 23.73%
- 5Y*
- -6.29%
- 10Y*
- 2.66%
CB
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -4.10%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 16.18%
- 1Y
- 9.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNC vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank
LNC
CB
LNC vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LNC | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.09 | 0.48 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.41 | 0.79 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.10 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 0.97 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | 1.93 | -1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LNC | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 0.48 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.85 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | 0.53 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.40 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between LNC and CB is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LNC vs. CB - Dividend Comparison
LNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than CB's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 5.07% | 4.04% | 5.68% | 6.67% | 5.86% | 2.46% | 3.18% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.59% |
CB Chubb Limited | 1.19% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
Drawdowns
LNC vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNC drawdown since its inception was -92.87%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNC and CB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNC | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.87% | -50.99% | -41.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.13% | -11.76% | -17.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.14% | -19.26% | -53.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.19% | -42.59% | -36.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.10% | -4.63% | -37.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.97% | -10.71% | -14.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.43% | 5.89% | +5.54% |
Volatility
LNC vs. CB - Volatility Comparison
Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) has a higher volatility of 10.28% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 4.79%. This indicates that LNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LNC | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.28% | 4.79% | +5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.26% | 13.06% | +12.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.43% | 19.81% | +20.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.00% | 20.41% | +22.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.80% | 23.68% | +23.12% |
Financials
LNC vs. CB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln National Corporation and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities