LNC vs. CB
LNC (Lincoln National Corporation) and CB (Chubb Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — LNC in Insurance - Life, CB in Insurance - Property & Casualty. Over the past 10 years, LNC returned 3.69%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for CB. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNC vs. CB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNC achieves a -13.39% return, which is significantly lower than CB's 4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LNC has underperformed CB with an annualized return of 3.69%, while CB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.20% annualized return.
LNC
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 6M
- -16.41%
- 1Y
- 19.74%
- 3Y*
- 23.49%
- 5Y*
- -4.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.69%
CB
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 4.82%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
LNC vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNC Lincoln National Corporation | -13.39% | 48.02% | 24.78% | -5.55% | -53.53% | 39.49% | -11.08% | 17.95% | -31.98% | 17.98% |
CB Chubb Limited | 4.82% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNC and CB is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1993 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LNC and CB has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
LNC:
$12.09
CB:
$28.35
LNC:
3.12
CB:
11.47
LNC:
0.02
CB:
0.80
LNC:
0.28
CB:
2.70
LNC:
$18.88B
CB:
$48.15B
LNC:
$3.21B
CB:
$17.01B
LNC:
$2.45B
CB:
$12.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNC vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank
LNC
CB
LNC vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNC | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 1.72 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | 3.88 | -2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNC vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNC drawdown since its inception was -92.87%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNC and CB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNC | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.87% | -50.99% | -41.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.13% | -9.36% | -19.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.13% | -14.35% | -14.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.14% | -19.26% | -53.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.19% | -42.59% | -36.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.74% | -4.55% | -33.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.06% | -10.67% | -14.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.88% | 4.15% | +9.73% |
Volatility
LNC vs. CB - Volatility Comparison
Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 5.77%. This indicates that LNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNC | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 5.77% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.00% | 12.73% | +12.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.41% | 17.69% | +15.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.83% | 20.22% | +22.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.77% | 23.69% | +23.08% |
Dividends
LNC vs. CB - Dividend Comparison
LNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than CB's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 4.78% | 4.04% | 5.68% | 6.67% | 5.86% | 2.46% | 3.18% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.59% |
Financials
LNC vs. CB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln National Corporation and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LNC and CB have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNC has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to CB (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNC dropped -92.87% vs CB's -50.99%.
CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNC and CB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer