PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LNC vs. CB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LNC and CB is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

LNC vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
208.86%
5,259.07%
LNC
CB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNC:

0.62

CB:

1.54

Sortino Ratio

LNC:

1.09

CB:

2.16

Omega Ratio

LNC:

1.14

CB:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

LNC:

0.35

CB:

2.72

Martin Ratio

LNC:

3.08

CB:

7.08

Ulcer Index

LNC:

7.07%

CB:

3.75%

Daily Std Dev

LNC:

34.87%

CB:

17.20%

Max Drawdown

LNC:

-92.87%

CB:

-64.24%

Current Drawdown

LNC:

-52.52%

CB:

-9.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNC:

$5.53B

CB:

$111.53B

EPS

LNC:

$1.43

CB:

$24.40

PE Ratio

LNC:

22.70

CB:

11.34

PEG Ratio

LNC:

1.24

CB:

3.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNC:

$12.66B

CB:

$54.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNC:

$14.08B

CB:

$54.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNC:

$1.77B

CB:

$12.00B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LNC having a 21.99% return and CB slightly higher at 22.50%. Over the past 10 years, LNC has underperformed CB with an annualized return of -3.00%, while CB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.12% annualized return.


LNC

YTD

21.99%

1M

-9.54%

6M

-0.19%

1Y

19.73%

5Y*

-8.18%

10Y*

-3.00%

CB

YTD

22.50%

1M

-3.09%

6M

3.92%

1Y

25.83%

5Y*

13.97%

10Y*

11.12%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNC vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNC, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.621.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNC, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.092.16
The chart of Omega ratio for LNC, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.141.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNC, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.352.72
The chart of Martin ratio for LNC, currently valued at 3.08, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.003.087.08
LNC
CB

The current LNC Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the CB Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNC and CB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.62
1.54
LNC
CB

Dividends

LNC vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

LNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than CB's 1.31% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LNC
Lincoln National Corporation
5.81%6.67%5.86%2.46%3.18%2.51%2.57%1.51%1.51%1.59%1.11%0.93%
CB
Chubb Limited
1.31%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%2.28%2.79%1.46%

Drawdowns

LNC vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNC drawdown since its inception was -92.87%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -64.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNC and CB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-52.52%
-9.20%
LNC
CB

Volatility

LNC vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 4.08%. This indicates that LNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.76%
4.08%
LNC
CB

Financials

LNC vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln National Corporation and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab