PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDT vs. DUK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDT vs. DUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medtronic plc (MDT) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a -11.80% return, which is significantly lower than DUK's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed DUK with an annualized return of 2.24%, while DUK has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.


MDT

1D
0.11%
1M
5.93%
6M
-12.44%
YTD
-11.80%
1Y
-4.03%
3Y*
1.10%
5Y*
-5.17%
10Y*
2.24%
ALL TIME*
13.23%

DUK

1D
0.67%
1M
1.61%
6M
7.69%
YTD
9.53%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
8.17%
ALL TIME*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDT vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDT
Medtronic plc
-11.80%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
9.53%12.72%15.56%-1.63%2.03%19.11%4.77%10.29%7.41%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MDT and DUK is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 1983

0.23

The correlation between MDT and DUK shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDT:

$106.62B

DUK:

$98.11B

EPS

MDT:

$3.73

DUK:

$6.61

PE Ratio

MDT:

22.34

DUK:

19.05

PEG Ratio

MDT:

11.61

DUK:

1.49

PS Ratio

MDT:

2.95

DUK:

2.94

PB Ratio

MDT:

2.17

DUK:

1.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDT:

$36.36B

DUK:

$33.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDT:

$23.64B

DUK:

$19.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

MDT:

$9.72B

DUK:

$15.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDT vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DUK
DUK Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUK Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUK Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDT vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDTDUKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.12

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

0.95

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

2.16

-2.47

MDT vs. DUK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the DUK Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDT and DUK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDT vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, smaller than the maximum DUK drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and DUK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDTDUKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.63%

-71.92%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.90%

-10.88%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.90%

-11.59%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.10%

-24.16%

-20.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.10%

-37.37%

-7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.93%

-4.62%

-23.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-10.84%

-5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.24%

4.77%

+8.47%

Volatility

MDT vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison

Medtronic plc (MDT) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) at 6.19%. This indicates that MDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDTDUKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

6.19%

+3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.91%

12.24%

+6.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.34%

15.65%

+7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

17.93%

+4.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.45%

20.45%

+3.00%

Dividends

MDT vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison

MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than DUK's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.66%3.60%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%
MDT
Medtronic plc
3.42%2.95%3.49%3.34%3.44%2.39%1.95%1.87%2.15%2.24%2.34%1.88%

Financials

MDT vs. DUK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medtronic plc and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
9.81B
9.18B
(MDT) Total Revenue
(DUK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MDT vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Medtronic plc and Duke Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
75.9%
67.9%
Portfolio components
MDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Medtronic plc reported a gross profit of 7.44B and revenue of 9.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.9%.

DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

MDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Medtronic plc reported an operating income of 1.56B and revenue of 9.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.

MDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Medtronic plc reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 9.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MDT and DUK have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDT has higher volatility (10.04%) compared to DUK (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDT dropped -57.63% vs DUK's -71.92%.

DUK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDT and DUK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer