PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDPIX vs. GTSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDPIX vs. GTSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDPIX achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly higher than GTSGX's 7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MDPIX has underperformed GTSGX with an annualized return of 8.73%, while GTSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.


MDPIX

1D
0.81%
1M
-1.12%
6M
9.08%
YTD
13.30%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
8.73%
ALL TIME*
7.69%

GTSGX

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.42%
6M
3.89%
YTD
7.83%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
11.24%
ALL TIME*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MDPIX vs. GTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Fund
13.30%5.68%11.55%14.16%-14.81%21.89%11.24%23.46%-12.78%14.18%
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
7.83%1.62%10.24%26.51%-13.60%26.31%9.45%33.53%-1.60%15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MDPIX and GTSGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001

0.90

The correlation between MDPIX and GTSGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDPIX vs. GTSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDPIX
MDPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MDPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MDPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSGX
GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDPIX vs. GTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDPIXGTSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.11

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

0.72

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

1.72

+5.32

MDPIX vs. GTSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the GTSGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDPIX and GTSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDPIX vs. GTSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDPIX drawdown since its inception was -57.32%, smaller than the maximum GTSGX drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDPIX and GTSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDPIXGTSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.32%

-73.82%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-11.99%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

-19.63%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

-21.94%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-38.25%

-3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-0.69%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-29.57%

+20.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

5.05%

-2.51%

Volatility

MDPIX vs. GTSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX) is 3.48%, while Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that MDPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDPIXGTSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

4.00%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

10.47%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

14.71%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

17.48%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.68%

18.07%

+2.61%

MDPIX vs. GTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDPIX has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is higher than GTSGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDPIX vs. GTSGX - Dividend Comparison

MDPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than GTSGX's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
3.12%3.37%5.76%1.25%1.96%4.38%3.43%3.74%7.57%3.58%4.34%6.09%
MDPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Fund
0.36%0.41%1.26%0.00%0.00%1.79%0.24%5.00%3.00%7.60%0.00%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDPIX and GTSGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTSGX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to MDPIX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDPIX dropped -57.32% vs GTSGX's -73.82%.

MDPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDPIX and GTSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer