PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDPIX vs. UOPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDPIX vs. UOPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDPIX achieves a 14.70% return, which is significantly lower than UOPIX's 38.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MDPIX has underperformed UOPIX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while UOPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.66% annualized return.


MDPIX

1D
0.38%
1M
3.56%
YTD
14.70%
6M
12.58%
1Y
24.32%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
9.57%

UOPIX

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.79%
YTD
38.26%
6M
34.47%
1Y
78.37%
3Y*
46.03%
5Y*
21.92%
10Y*
35.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDPIX vs. UOPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Fund
14.70%5.68%11.55%14.16%-14.81%21.89%11.24%23.46%-12.78%14.18%
UOPIX
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund
38.26%30.26%41.75%115.97%-60.70%48.28%86.57%80.53%-9.41%68.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MDPIX and UOPIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001

0.78

The correlation between MDPIX and UOPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDPIX vs. UOPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDPIX
MDPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MDPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MDPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

UOPIX
UOPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
UOPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UOPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
UOPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UOPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UOPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDPIX vs. UOPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDPIXUOPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.30

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.13

11.34

-1.21

MDPIX vs. UOPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the UOPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDPIX and UOPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDPIX vs. UOPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDPIX drawdown since its inception was -57.32%, smaller than the maximum UOPIX drawdown of -99.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDPIX and UOPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDPIXUOPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.32%

-99.00%

+41.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-24.97%

+15.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

-42.52%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

-65.01%

+40.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-65.01%

+22.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-2.91%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-67.59%

+58.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

7.26%

-4.75%

Volatility

MDPIX vs. UOPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX) is 4.54%, while ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) has a volatility of 16.81%. This indicates that MDPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UOPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDPIXUOPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

16.81%

-12.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

28.42%

-16.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

35.43%

-19.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

45.59%

-25.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

44.43%

-23.68%

MDPIX vs. UOPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDPIX has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is higher than UOPIX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDPIX vs. UOPIX - Dividend Comparison

MDPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than UOPIX's 13.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Fund
0.36%0.41%1.26%0.00%0.00%1.79%0.24%5.00%3.00%7.60%0.00%0.05%
UOPIX
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund
13.21%18.27%0.41%0.00%5.64%11.03%9.78%5.78%6.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDPIX and UOPIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UOPIX has higher volatility (16.81%) compared to MDPIX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDPIX dropped -57.32% vs UOPIX's -99.00%.

UOPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDPIX and UOPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer