MDPIX vs. FZAMX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX).
MDPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Sep 3, 2001. FZAMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013.
Performance
MDPIX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDPIX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Fund | -0.89% | 5.68% | 11.55% | 14.16% | -14.81% | 21.89% | 11.24% | 23.46% | -12.78% | 14.18% |
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z | 1.33% | 12.00% | 17.39% | 15.15% | -14.70% | 25.40% | 18.84% | 23.85% | -14.85% | 20.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDPIX achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MDPIX has underperformed FZAMX with an annualized return of 8.02%, while FZAMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.
MDPIX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 12.12%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.02%
FZAMX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -8.81%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDPIX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDPIX has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MDPIX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank
MDPIX
FZAMX
MDPIX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDPIX | FZAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 1.00 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.47 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.21 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 1.32 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 5.87 | -2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDPIX | FZAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.00 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.41 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.52 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDPIX and FZAMX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDPIX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison
MDPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than FZAMX's 6.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Fund | 0.41% | 0.41% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 0.24% | 5.00% | 3.00% | 7.60% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z | 6.96% | 10.09% | 6.93% | 2.83% | 5.86% | 18.58% | 1.41% | 3.50% | 10.72% | 7.81% | 5.00% | 4.90% |
Drawdowns
MDPIX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDPIX drawdown since its inception was -57.32%, which is greater than FZAMX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDPIX and FZAMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDPIX | FZAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.32% | -42.32% | -15.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.13% | -14.82% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -25.24% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | -42.32% | +0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.02% | -9.77% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -6.14% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.34% | -0.03% |
Volatility
MDPIX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Mid Cap Fund (MDPIX) is 5.74%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that MDPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDPIX | FZAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 7.69% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 13.44% | -1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.83% | 22.07% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 20.12% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 20.85% | -0.17% |