MDLZ vs. SCHF
MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ returned 6.09%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for SCHF. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDLZ vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 15.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 6.09%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.82% annualized return.
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
MDLZ vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.39% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDLZ and SCHF is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MDLZ and SCHF has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDLZ vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
MDLZ
SCHF
MDLZ vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDLZ | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.33 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 2.64 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 10.14 | -10.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDLZ vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDLZ | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -34.87% | -7.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.93% | -11.48% | -14.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -13.41% | -15.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -29.14% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.74% | -34.87% | +5.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.59% | -1.00% | -11.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -7.37% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 2.99% | +11.71% |
Volatility
MDLZ vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) is 5.46%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that MDLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDLZ | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 6.91% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.28% | 14.42% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 16.67% | +5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 16.56% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 17.24% | +3.79% |
Dividends
MDLZ vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than SCHF's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDLZ and SCHF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to MDLZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDLZ and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer