PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLZ vs. ALGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDLZ vs. ALGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than ALGT's 7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ has outperformed ALGT with an annualized return of 6.09%, while ALGT has yielded a comparatively lower -3.72% annualized return.


MDLZ

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.22%
YTD
18.03%
6M
18.65%
1Y
-2.75%
3Y*
-1.98%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
6.09%

ALGT

1D
6.45%
1M
22.28%
YTD
7.41%
6M
6.67%
1Y
79.41%
3Y*
-5.92%
5Y*
-14.80%
10Y*
-3.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDLZ vs. ALGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
18.03%-7.03%-15.30%11.17%2.92%15.87%8.58%40.42%-4.27%-1.58%
ALGT
Allegiant Travel Company
7.41%-9.40%16.03%23.44%-63.65%-1.16%9.32%76.98%-33.95%-5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLZ and ALGT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2006

0.23

The correlation between MDLZ and ALGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MDLZ:

$2.68

ALGT:

-$1.89

PS Ratio

MDLZ:

1.56

ALGT:

0.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDLZ:

$39.30B

ALGT:

$2.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDLZ:

$11.31B

ALGT:

$815.04M

EBITDA (TTM)

MDLZ:

$4.67B

ALGT:

$340.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLZ vs. ALGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLZ
MDLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MDLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ALGT
ALGT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ALGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ALGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLZ vs. ALGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDLZALGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.22

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

1.81

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

4.23

-4.53

MDLZ vs. ALGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the ALGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLZ and ALGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDLZ vs. ALGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, smaller than the maximum ALGT drawdown of -86.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and ALGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLZALGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.52%

-86.01%

+43.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.93%

-39.13%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

-70.95%

+41.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-81.93%

+52.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.74%

-86.01%

+56.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.59%

-64.75%

+52.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-31.70%

+20.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.70%

16.74%

-2.04%

Volatility

MDLZ vs. ALGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) is 5.46%, while Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) has a volatility of 24.27%. This indicates that MDLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDLZALGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

24.27%

-18.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.28%

44.93%

-28.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.26%

65.71%

-43.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

54.96%

-35.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

51.42%

-30.39%

Dividends

MDLZ vs. ALGT - Dividend Comparison

MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while ALGT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALGT
Allegiant Travel Company
0.00%0.00%1.27%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.37%1.61%2.79%1.81%1.44%1.64%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
3.13%3.60%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%

Financials

MDLZ vs. ALGT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mondelez International, Inc. and Allegiant Travel Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
10.08B
732.43M
(MDLZ) Total Revenue
(ALGT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MDLZ vs. ALGT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mondelez International, Inc. and Allegiant Travel Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
27.8%
65.4%
Portfolio components
MDLZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 10.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

ALGT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a gross profit of 479.13M and revenue of 732.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.

MDLZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported an operating income of 808.00M and revenue of 10.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

ALGT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported an operating income of 81.10M and revenue of 732.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

MDLZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a net income of 560.00M and revenue of 10.08B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

ALGT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a net income of 42.48M and revenue of 732.43M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MDLZ and ALGT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALGT has higher volatility (24.27%) compared to MDLZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs ALGT's -86.01%.

ALGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDLZ and ALGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer