PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIV vs. HIPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIV vs. HIPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIV achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly higher than HIPS's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MDIV has underperformed HIPS with an annualized return of 4.66%, while HIPS has yielded a comparatively higher 5.55% annualized return.


MDIV

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.10%
YTD
7.68%
6M
7.38%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
4.66%

HIPS

1D
-0.79%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
3.28%
6M
2.30%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
5.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIV vs. HIPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
7.68%3.77%10.05%11.50%-3.86%16.51%-14.84%18.59%-5.78%5.61%
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
3.28%1.00%13.71%16.09%-13.47%22.65%-11.74%22.94%-9.30%6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIV and HIPS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2015

0.71

The correlation between MDIV and HIPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDIV vs. HIPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDIV
HIPS

Financial Services

22.4%
31.6%

Real Estate

21.6%
31.7%

Energy

17.6%
32.7%

Utilities

9.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.0%

-

Communication Services

3.2%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.2%

-

Healthcare

1.6%

-

Industrials

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.7%
4.0%

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

MDIV
22.4%
HIPS
31.6%

Real Estate

MDIV
21.6%
HIPS
31.7%

Energy

MDIV
17.6%
HIPS
32.7%

Utilities

MDIV
9.6%
HIPS

-

Consumer Defensive

MDIV
8.0%
HIPS

-

Communication Services

MDIV
3.2%
HIPS
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MDIV
3.2%
HIPS

-

Healthcare

MDIV
1.6%
HIPS

-

Industrials

MDIV
1.6%
HIPS

-

Basic Materials

MDIV
0.7%
HIPS
4.0%

Technology

MDIV

-

HIPS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIV vs. HIPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIV
MDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

HIPS
HIPS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
HIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIV vs. HIPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDIVHIPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.11

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

1.01

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

2.70

+6.39

MDIV vs. HIPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the HIPS Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIV and HIPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDIVHIPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

0.65

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.30

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.31

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.23

+0.12

Drawdowns

MDIV vs. HIPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIV drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, smaller than the maximum HIPS drawdown of -53.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIV and HIPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIVHIPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.50%

-53.14%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-6.15%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.62%

-15.41%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

-21.28%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.50%

-53.14%

+4.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-4.23%

+3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-7.39%

+2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

2.29%

-1.07%

Volatility

MDIV vs. HIPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) is 1.62%, while GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) has a volatility of 1.77%. This indicates that MDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIVHIPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

1.77%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.32%

7.05%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.71%

9.57%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

13.29%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

18.07%

-2.84%

MDIV vs. HIPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIV has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than HIPS's 3.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIV vs. HIPS - Dividend Comparison

MDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, less than HIPS's 11.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
11.19%11.04%10.04%10.32%10.76%8.43%9.50%6.93%8.66%7.28%7.20%8.17%
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
6.39%6.51%6.40%6.08%6.71%5.30%6.00%5.90%6.76%6.04%6.35%7.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDIV and HIPS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIPS has higher volatility (1.77%) compared to MDIV (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIV dropped -48.50% vs HIPS's -53.14%.

On 10-year performance, HIPS leads with 5.55% vs 4.66% for MDIV. On fees, MDIV is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, MDIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HIPS has performed better with a 5.55% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDIV is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 3.19% for HIPS.

HIPS has the higher dividend yield at 11.19%, compared with 6.39% for MDIV.

MDIV tracks NASDAQ US Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index, while HIPS tracks TFMS HIPS Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MDIV and 3.19% for HIPS.

MDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIV and HIPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer