PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDISX vs. LVAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDISX vs. LVAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDISX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than LVAFX's 13.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDISX having a 8.58% annualized return and LVAFX not far behind at 8.16%.


MDISX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.50%
6M
3.70%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
8.58%

LVAFX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.53%
YTD
13.49%
6M
14.99%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
8.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDISX vs. LVAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
1.50%23.75%6.38%20.48%-4.73%19.60%-4.38%24.74%-10.86%7.22%
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
13.49%22.33%0.10%9.81%-4.04%17.36%-5.16%17.54%-6.47%18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MDISX and LVAFX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.86

The correlation between MDISX and LVAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDISX vs. LVAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDISX
MDISX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MDISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDISX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MDISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDISX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

LVAFX
LVAFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LVAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDISX vs. LVAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDISXLVAFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

3.11

-1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

4.55

-2.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.58

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

4.59

-3.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.23

17.62

-13.39

MDISX vs. LVAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the LVAFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDISX and LVAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDISXLVAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

3.11

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.64

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.60

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.55

+0.26

Drawdowns

MDISX vs. LVAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDISX drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, which is greater than LVAFX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDISX and LVAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDISXLVAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

-33.69%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-5.76%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-17.52%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-18.34%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.15%

-33.69%

-6.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

0.00%

-4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-4.75%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

1.50%

+1.75%

Volatility

MDISX vs. LVAFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) at 2.03%. This indicates that MDISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDISXLVAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.03%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

6.12%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

8.49%

+3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

13.23%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

13.59%

+3.52%

MDISX vs. LVAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDISX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LVAFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDISX vs. LVAFX - Dividend Comparison

MDISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than LVAFX's 8.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
8.96%10.17%2.71%15.64%2.90%2.90%2.14%7.62%3.59%7.10%1.66%1.74%
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
10.40%10.55%12.84%7.12%10.29%8.75%3.50%7.21%7.50%2.97%4.13%7.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDISX and LVAFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDISX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to LVAFX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDISX dropped -40.15% vs LVAFX's -33.69%.

LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDISX and LVAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer