MDFGX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund (MDFGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
MDFGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 31, 1997. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
MDFGX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDFGX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDFGX BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund | -12.62% | 12.63% | 31.58% | 48.77% | -37.83% | 20.78% | 40.16% | 31.89% | 1.81% | 32.37% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDFGX achieves a -12.62% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MDFGX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 14.14%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
MDFGX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -12.62%
- 6M
- -13.55%
- 1Y
- 10.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDFGX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDFGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MDFGX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
MDFGX
FASGX
MDFGX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund (MDFGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDFGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 1.21 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 1.73 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.26 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 1.55 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 6.89 | -5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDFGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 1.21 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.53 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.70 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.60 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDFGX and FASGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDFGX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
MDFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.33%, more than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDFGX BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund | 22.33% | 19.51% | 12.73% | 3.59% | 9.46% | 12.95% | 5.46% | 10.67% | 14.31% | 12.51% | 4.01% | 11.22% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
MDFGX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDFGX drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, roughly equal to the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDFGX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDFGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.99% | -47.35% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.74% | -9.07% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | -23.54% | -18.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | -27.20% | -15.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.74% | -7.95% | -8.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.27% | -6.74% | -4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 2.04% | +2.75% |
Volatility
MDFGX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund (MDFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 4.57%. This indicates that MDFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDFGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 4.57% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 7.78% | +5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.35% | 12.82% | +10.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 12.14% | +11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 12.56% | +9.87% |