PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDEGX vs. LVAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDEGX vs. LVAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDEGX achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly lower than LVAFX's 17.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MDEGX has outperformed LVAFX with an annualized return of 11.70%, while LVAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.15% annualized return.


MDEGX

1D
2.41%
1M
-3.53%
6M
10.26%
YTD
13.16%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
11.70%
ALL TIME*
9.04%

LVAFX

1D
0.31%
1M
5.72%
6M
12.90%
YTD
17.34%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
8.15%
ALL TIME*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MDEGX vs. LVAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDEGX
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares
13.16%12.11%7.27%33.16%-20.47%20.42%16.28%32.46%-4.81%24.48%
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
17.34%22.33%0.10%9.81%-4.04%17.36%-5.16%17.54%-6.47%18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MDEGX and LVAFX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between MDEGX and LVAFX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDEGX vs. LVAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDEGX
MDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LVAFX
LVAFX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LVAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDEGX vs. LVAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDEGXLVAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.64

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

5.01

-3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

17.92

-13.43

MDEGX vs. LVAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDEGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the LVAFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDEGX and LVAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDEGX vs. LVAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDEGX drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than LVAFX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEGX and LVAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDEGXLVAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.79%

-33.69%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-5.76%

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.14%

-17.52%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-18.34%

-13.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.98%

-33.69%

+1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

0.00%

-5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-4.71%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

1.61%

+1.66%

Volatility

MDEGX vs. LVAFX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) at 1.99%. This indicates that MDEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDEGXLVAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

1.99%

+4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.70%

6.55%

+10.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

8.51%

+10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

13.24%

+7.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

13.53%

+5.66%

MDEGX vs. LVAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDEGX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than LVAFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDEGX vs. LVAFX - Dividend Comparison

MDEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, less than LVAFX's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
8.67%10.17%2.71%15.64%2.90%2.90%2.14%7.62%3.59%7.10%1.66%1.74%
MDEGX
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares
6.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%18.18%22.48%6.30%11.68%8.21%3.81%0.62%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDEGX and LVAFX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDEGX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to LVAFX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEGX dropped -48.79% vs LVAFX's -33.69%.

LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDEGX and LVAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer