PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDEGX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDEGX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDEGX achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MDEGX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 12.12%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.58% annualized return.


MDEGX

1D
0.06%
1M
3.53%
YTD
14.98%
6M
13.38%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
12.12%

NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDEGX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDEGX
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares
14.98%12.11%7.27%33.16%-20.47%20.42%16.28%32.46%-4.81%24.48%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MDEGX and NASDX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2005

0.82

The correlation between MDEGX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDEGX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDEGX
MDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDEGX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDEGXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.46

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.65

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

14.16

-6.58

MDEGX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDEGX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDEGXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.70

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.89

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

1.00

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.33

+0.17

Drawdowns

MDEGX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDEGX drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEGX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDEGXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.79%

-83.16%

+34.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-11.90%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.14%

-22.71%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-35.33%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.98%

-35.33%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

0.00%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-34.37%

+26.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.06%

+0.03%

Volatility

MDEGX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) at 4.51%. This indicates that MDEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDEGXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

4.51%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

12.19%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

16.10%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.58%

23.06%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

22.68%

-3.61%

MDEGX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDEGX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDEGX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

MDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NASDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDEGX
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%18.18%22.48%6.30%11.68%8.21%3.81%0.62%7.88%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDEGX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDEGX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to NASDX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEGX dropped -48.79% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDEGX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer