PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDEGX vs. ECAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDEGX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDEGX achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly higher than ECAT's 11.23% return.


MDEGX

1D
0.06%
1M
3.53%
YTD
14.98%
6M
13.38%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
12.12%

ECAT

1D
-1.20%
1M
6.84%
YTD
11.23%
6M
9.37%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDEGX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MDEGX
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares
14.98%12.11%7.27%33.16%-20.47%4.45%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
11.23%16.64%19.96%32.36%-21.90%-6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MDEGX and ECAT is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.71

The correlation between MDEGX and ECAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDEGX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDEGX
MDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ECAT
ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDEGX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDEGXECATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

1.56

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

2.22

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.77

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.58

6.65

+0.93

MDEGX vs. ECAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the ECAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDEGX and ECAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDEGXECATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.56

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.55

-0.05

Drawdowns

MDEGX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDEGX drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEGX and ECAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDEGXECATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.79%

-32.23%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-11.80%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.14%

-15.79%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-1.20%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-9.11%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.14%

-0.05%

Volatility

MDEGX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares (MDEGX) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) at 3.31%. This indicates that MDEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDEGXECATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

3.31%

+2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

10.59%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

13.44%

+4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.58%

16.90%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

16.90%

+2.17%

MDEGX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDEGX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDEGX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison

MDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
21.71%23.00%17.44%9.14%8.94%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDEGX
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund Investor A Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%18.18%22.48%6.30%11.68%8.21%3.81%0.62%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDEGX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDEGX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to ECAT (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEGX dropped -48.79% vs ECAT's -32.23%.

ECAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDEGX and ECAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer