MDAA vs. EAOM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) and EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MDAA is actively managed, while EAOM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDAA charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOM.

Performance

MDAA vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDAA achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than EAOM's 5.08% return.

MDAA

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 8.24%
• YTD: 22.13%
• 6M: 22.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAOM

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 2.36%
• YTD: 5.08%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 14.66%
• 3Y*: 10.47%
• 5Y*: 4.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDAA vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	22.13%	-0.27%
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	5.08%	1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MDAA and EAOM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.88

Return for Risk

MDAA vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM

EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 68
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDAA vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDAA	EAOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	0.76	+0.71

Drawdowns

MDAA vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDAA drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDAA and EAOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDAA	EAOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.59%	-20.73%	+6.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.63%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-0.45%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-4.97%	+2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MDAA	EAOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.89%	6.44%	+17.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.89%	8.07%	+15.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.89%	7.91%	+15.98%

MDAA vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDAA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDAA vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

MDAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than EAOM's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	2.78%	2.89%	2.89%	2.70%	1.93%	1.32%	1.02%
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	0.38%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDAA and EAOM in my portfolio?

MDAA and EAOM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MDAA or EAOM?

On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDAA or EAOM?

EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDAA or EAOM?

EAOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.38% for MDAA.

What is the main difference between MDAA and EAOM?

They also come from different issuers: Myriad and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MDAA and 0.18% for EAOM.