MCHT.L vs. KROG.L
MCHT.L (Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF) and KROG.L (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Invesco and Global X respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MCHT.L returned 13.22%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for KROG.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MCHT.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROG.L.
Performance
MCHT.L vs. KROG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MCHT.L is traded in USD, while KROG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the KROG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHT.L achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than KROG.L's 15.27% return.
MCHT.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 18.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROG.L
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 11.50%
- 3Y*
- 0.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCHT.L vs. KROG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHT.L Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF | 2.81% | 31.75% | 21.18% | -18.06% | -27.46% |
KROG.L Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 15.27% | 7.94% | -8.44% | -23.03% | -23.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHT.L and KROG.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHT.L vs. KROG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MCHT.L
KROG.L
MCHT.L vs. KROG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCHT.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.06 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | 2.34 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCHT.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.71 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | -0.42 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
MCHT.L vs. KROG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHT.L drawdown since its inception was -62.63%, which is greater than KROG.L's maximum drawdown of -53.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHT.L and KROG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHT.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.63% | -53.14% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.55% | -10.76% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.84% | -29.25% | -4.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.53% | -37.48% | +8.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.11% | -37.00% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.08% | 4.91% | +5.17% |
Volatility
MCHT.L vs. KROG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) at 6.11%. This indicates that MCHT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHT.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 6.11% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 12.61% | +4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.69% | 16.06% | +7.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.35% | 21.20% | +22.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.35% | 21.20% | +22.15% |
MCHT.L vs. KROG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than KROG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCHT.L vs. KROG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MCHT.L nor KROG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHT.L and KROG.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MCHT.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MCHT.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MCHT.L and 0.50% for KROG.L.
Find the right allocation for MCHT.L and KROG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer