MCHT.L vs. EQQQ.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L).

MCHT.L and EQQQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MCHT.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Jun 11, 2021. EQQQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. Both MCHT.L and EQQQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MCHT.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MCHT.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MCHT.L Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF	-8.26%	31.75%	21.18%	-18.06%	-31.36%	-19.40%
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	-5.61%	19.96%	26.41%	55.59%	-33.50%	15.50%

Different Trading Currencies

MCHT.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHT.L achieves a -8.26% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's -5.29% return.

MCHT.L

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: -8.26%
• 6M: -19.75%
• 1Y: 6.10%
• 3Y*: 4.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EQQQ.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.38%
• YTD: -5.29%
• 6M: -3.14%
• 1Y: 23.33%
• 3Y*: 22.92%
• 5Y*: 13.01%
• 10Y*: 18.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCHT.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

MCHT.L

Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF

EQQQ.L

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

MCHT.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHT.L

MCHT.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
MCHT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
MCHT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
MCHT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
MCHT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MCHT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 14

EQQQ.L

EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHT.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCHT.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	1.19	-0.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	1.77	-1.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.23	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	2.64	-2.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.67	9.90	-9.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCHT.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHT.L and EQQQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCHT.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24	1.19	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.30	0.76	-1.06

Correlation

The correlation between MCHT.L and EQQQ.L is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MCHT.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

MCHT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCHT.L Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	0.29%	0.29%	0.38%	0.39%	0.56%	0.25%	0.41%	0.56%	0.63%	0.67%	0.77%	0.72%

Drawdowns

MCHT.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHT.L drawdown since its inception was -62.63%, which is greater than EQQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHT.L and EQQQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCHT.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.63%	-33.75%	-28.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.87%	-10.97%	-8.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.22%	-8.04%	-28.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.61%	-5.64%	-33.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.11%	3.66%	+5.45%

Volatility

MCHT.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 5.30%. This indicates that MCHT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCHT.L	EQQQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	5.30%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.80%	11.85%	+3.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.76%	19.55%	+6.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.99%	20.59%	+23.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.99%	19.82%	+24.17%