MCHT.L vs. EQGB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L).
MCHT.L and EQGB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MCHT.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Jun 11, 2021. EQGB.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 17, 2017. Both MCHT.L and EQGB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MCHT.L vs. EQGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCHT.L vs. EQGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHT.L Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF | -8.26% | 31.75% | 21.18% | -18.06% | -31.36% | -19.40% |
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | -7.37% | 28.61% | 24.02% | 62.04% | -42.01% | 11.22% |
Different Trading Currencies
MCHT.L is traded in USD, while EQGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHT.L achieves a -8.26% return, which is significantly lower than EQGB.L's -6.46% return.
MCHT.L
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -8.26%
- 6M
- -19.75%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- -6.46%
- 6M
- -4.02%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- 25.36%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCHT.L vs. EQGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EQGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCHT.L vs. EQGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
MCHT.L
EQGB.L
MCHT.L vs. EQGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCHT.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 1.13 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.72 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.22 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 2.06 | -1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | 7.93 | -7.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCHT.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 1.13 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.30 | 0.67 | -0.97 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHT.L and EQGB.L is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MCHT.L vs. EQGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MCHT.L nor EQGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHT.L Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
Drawdowns
MCHT.L vs. EQGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHT.L drawdown since its inception was -62.63%, which is greater than EQGB.L's maximum drawdown of -47.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHT.L and EQGB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHT.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.63% | -36.77% | -25.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.87% | -11.33% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.22% | -8.28% | -27.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.61% | -7.64% | -31.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.11% | 3.10% | +6.01% |
Volatility
MCHT.L vs. EQGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI China Technology All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF (MCHT.L) is 6.41%, while Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that MCHT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCHT.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 7.08% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.80% | 13.75% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.76% | 22.98% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.99% | 24.73% | +19.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.99% | 24.85% | +19.14% |