MCHP vs. UL
MCHP (Microchip Technology Incorporated) and UL (The Unilever Group) are both stocks. MCHP operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MCHP returned 15.99%/yr vs 5.33%/yr for UL. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MCHP vs. UL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHP achieves a 51.10% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHP has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 15.99%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.33% annualized return.
MCHP
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 51.10%
- 6M
- 43.32%
- 1Y
- 48.83%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 15.99%
UL
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- 1Y
- -13.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
MCHP vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 51.10% | 14.61% | -34.96% | 30.90% | -17.98% | 27.49% | 33.73% | 48.02% | -16.71% | 39.46% |
UL The Unilever Group | -8.35% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHP and UL is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 1993 | 0.19 |
The correlation between MCHP and UL shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MCHP:
$0.43
UL:
€5.06
MCHP:
221.70
UL:
10.06
MCHP:
3.34
UL:
1.97
MCHP:
8.20
UL:
1.09
MCHP:
$4.71B
UL:
€109.27B
MCHP:
$2.72B
UL:
€90.89B
MCHP:
$1.02B
UL:
€24.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHP vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank
MCHP
UL
MCHP vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCHP | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.90 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | -0.60 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | -1.23 | +4.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCHP vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHP drawdown since its inception was -63.77%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHP and UL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHP | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.77% | -53.55% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.41% | -25.09% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.77% | -25.09% | -38.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.77% | -26.53% | -37.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.77% | -30.13% | -33.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.00% | -19.64% | +12.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -10.61% | -6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.99% | 12.20% | +0.79% |
Volatility
MCHP vs. UL - Volatility Comparison
Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) has a higher volatility of 16.18% compared to The Unilever Group (UL) at 6.11%. This indicates that MCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHP | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.18% | 6.11% | +10.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.33% | 16.78% | +15.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.05% | 21.50% | +22.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.17% | 20.87% | +23.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.91% | 21.61% | +20.30% |
Dividends
MCHP vs. UL - Dividend Comparison
MCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than UL's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 1.91% | 2.86% | 3.16% | 1.76% | 1.65% | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.40% | 2.02% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 3.07% |
UL The Unilever Group | 3.87% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Financials
MCHP vs. UL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microchip Technology Incorporated and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MCHP vs. UL - Profitability Comparison
MCHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported a gross profit of 967.30M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.8%.
UL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MCHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported an operating income of 211.10M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
UL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
MCHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microchip Technology Incorporated reported a net income of 116.40M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
UL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHP and UL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCHP has higher volatility (16.18%) compared to UL (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHP dropped -63.77% vs UL's -53.55%.
MCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCHP and UL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer