MCHP vs. CDNS
Compare and contrast key facts about Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MCHP or CDNS.
Correlation
The correlation between MCHP and CDNS is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MCHP vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MCHP:
-0.83
CDNS:
0.35
MCHP:
-1.07
CDNS:
0.75
MCHP:
0.87
CDNS:
1.09
MCHP:
-0.72
CDNS:
0.49
MCHP:
-1.56
CDNS:
1.03
MCHP:
20.33%
CDNS:
11.63%
MCHP:
38.06%
CDNS:
34.70%
MCHP:
-62.53%
CDNS:
-93.13%
MCHP:
-42.00%
CDNS:
-7.90%
Fundamentals
MCHP:
$30.61B
CDNS:
$82.48B
MCHP:
$1.44
CDNS:
$3.79
MCHP:
39.58
CDNS:
79.35
MCHP:
7.04
CDNS:
3.11
MCHP:
$3.73B
CDNS:
$3.29B
MCHP:
$2.07B
CDNS:
$2.96B
MCHP:
$1.20B
CDNS:
$1.12B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHP achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHP has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 11.95%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.37% annualized return.
MCHP
-0.61%
-3.52%
-36.94%
-31.55%
2.53%
11.95%
CDNS
0.09%
-4.07%
4.37%
8.34%
32.61%
32.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MCHP vs. CDNS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MCHP
CDNS
MCHP vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MCHP vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
MCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHP Microchip Technology Incorporated | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.76% | 1.65% | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.40% | 2.02% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 3.08% | 3.16% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MCHP vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHP drawdown since its inception was -62.53%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHP and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MCHP vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 6.89%. This indicates that MCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MCHP vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microchip Technology Incorporated and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities