PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCHP vs. CDNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

MCHP vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MCHP vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
3.21%14.61%-34.96%30.90%-17.98%27.49%33.73%48.02%-16.71%39.46%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
-10.36%4.03%10.31%69.55%-13.80%36.59%96.70%59.52%3.97%65.82%

Fundamentals

EPS

MCHP:

-$0.27

CDNS:

$4.06

PS Ratio

MCHP:

5.38

CDNS:

14.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCHP:

$4.37B

CDNS:

$5.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCHP:

$2.25B

CDNS:

$5.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

MCHP:

$710.40M

CDNS:

$1.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHP achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's -10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHP has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 12.61%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 28.05% annualized return.


MCHP

1D
1.19%
1M
-12.02%
YTD
3.21%
6M
3.51%
1Y
38.84%
3Y*
-5.61%
5Y*
-1.96%
10Y*
12.61%

CDNS

1D
0.83%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
-10.36%
6M
-20.39%
1Y
8.27%
3Y*
10.07%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
28.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCHP vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHP
MCHP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHP vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCHPCDNSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.21

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

0.60

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.08

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

0.36

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.91

0.80

+2.11

MCHP vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHP and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCHPCDNSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.21

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.42

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.84

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.22

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between MCHP and CDNS is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MCHP vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

MCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCHP
Microchip Technology Incorporated
2.78%2.86%3.16%1.76%1.65%0.98%1.07%1.40%2.02%1.65%2.24%3.07%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MCHP vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHP drawdown since its inception was -63.77%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHP and CDNS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MCHPCDNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.77%

-93.13%

+29.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.41%

-28.09%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.77%

-29.59%

-34.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.77%

-32.12%

-31.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.96%

-24.96%

-6.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.74%

-39.79%

+23.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.46%

12.71%

+0.75%

Volatility

MCHP vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) has a higher volatility of 12.97% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 7.54%. This indicates that MCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MCHPCDNSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.97%

7.54%

+5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.23%

25.41%

+6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.57%

39.60%

+18.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.43%

35.24%

+8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.35%

33.42%

+7.93%

Financials

MCHP vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microchip Technology Incorporated and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
1.19B
1.44B
(MCHP) Total Revenue
(CDNS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items