MCHI vs. WNTR
MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MCHI is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. MCHI is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, MCHI returned 0.60% vs 107.38% for WNTR. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
MCHI vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -6.49% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.75% return.
MCHI
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 9.61%
- 6M
- -9.98%
- YTD
- -6.49%
- 1Y
- 0.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- -2.80%
- 10Y*
- 4.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.49%
WNTR
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 107.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $148.99M | $159.51M | $173.67M | |
| $4.02M | $3.86M | $3.95M |
MCHI vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -6.49% | 11.64% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.75% | 52.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHI and WNTR is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHI vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
MCHI
WNTR
MCHI vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCHI | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.32 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 2.71 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 6.87 | -6.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCHI vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHI | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -42.65% | -20.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.22% | -42.65% | +19.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.24% | -9.64% | -26.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.67% | -20.18% | -4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.26% | 16.81% | -5.55% |
Volatility
MCHI vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) is 5.57%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that MCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHI | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 14.85% | -9.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 47.43% | -32.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.62% | 54.68% | -34.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.41% | 53.42% | -23.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.35% | 53.42% | -26.07% |
MCHI vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCHI vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than WNTR's 107.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 1.96% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.02% | 58.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHI and WNTR have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WNTR has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to MCHI (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs WNTR's -42.65%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs 0.60% for MCHI. On fees, MCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCHI has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs 0.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 1.96% for MCHI.
MCHI is categorized as China Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCHI and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer