PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCHI vs. KTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCHI vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -7.22% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -11.81% return.


MCHI

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
-7.22%
6M
-8.98%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
-5.76%
10Y*
4.49%

KTEC

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
-11.81%
6M
-13.79%
1Y
-10.55%
3Y*
7.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCHI vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
-7.22%31.04%17.73%-11.94%-23.01%-22.12%
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
-11.81%21.01%16.13%-10.41%-26.12%-29.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MCHI and KTEC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021

0.94

The correlation between MCHI and KTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

MCHI vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MCHI
KTEC

Consumer Cyclical

26.4%
48.6%

Financial Services

19.1%

-

Communication Services

18.8%
27.6%

Technology

9.6%
21.3%

Basic Materials

5.5%

-

Healthcare

5.4%
2.5%

Industrials

5.0%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Utilities

1.7%

-

Real Estate

1.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

MCHI
26.4%
KTEC
48.6%

Financial Services

MCHI
19.1%
KTEC

-

Communication Services

MCHI
18.8%
KTEC
27.6%

Technology

MCHI
9.6%
KTEC
21.3%

Basic Materials

MCHI
5.5%
KTEC

-

Healthcare

MCHI
5.4%
KTEC
2.5%

Industrials

MCHI
5.0%
KTEC

-

Energy

MCHI
3.7%
KTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

MCHI
3.2%
KTEC

-

Utilities

MCHI
1.7%
KTEC

-

Real Estate

MCHI
1.5%
KTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCHI vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHI
MCHI Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

KTEC
KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHI vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCHIKTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.96

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

-0.36

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.48

-0.65

+1.12

MCHI vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHI and KTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCHIKTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

-0.38

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

-0.24

+0.33

Drawdowns

MCHI vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and KTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCHIKTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.95%

-66.90%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.17%

-29.36%

+12.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.85%

-34.71%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.74%

-44.35%

+7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.53%

-43.97%

+19.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.36%

16.34%

-7.98%

Volatility

MCHI vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) is 7.27%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 10.62%. This indicates that MCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCHIKTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

10.62%

-3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

20.54%

-6.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.16%

28.01%

-7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.71%

43.20%

-12.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.39%

43.20%

-15.81%

MCHI vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCHI vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than KTEC's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
3.80%3.36%0.27%0.81%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
2.28%2.12%2.31%2.66%1.78%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MCHI and KTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KTEC has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to MCHI (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs KTEC's -66.90%.

On 3-year performance, MCHI leads with 9.73% vs 7.01% for KTEC. On fees, MCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCHI has been the lower-risk option at 7.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MCHI has performed better with a 9.73% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 2.28% for MCHI.

MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 0.69% for KTEC.

MCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCHI and KTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer