PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KTEC vs. OBOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KTEC vs. OBOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -12.02% return, which is significantly lower than OBOR's 1.94% return.


KTEC

1D
0.06%
1M
11.11%
6M
-10.82%
YTD
-12.02%
1Y
-13.52%
3Y*
1.38%
5Y*
-6.94%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-10.24%

OBOR

1D
1.70%
1M
4.20%
6M
-4.82%
YTD
1.94%
1Y
14.64%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$995.11K$971.85K$1.05M
$9.53K$9.84K$16.54K

KTEC vs. OBOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
-12.02%21.01%16.13%-10.41%-26.12%-29.98%
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
1.94%27.86%8.55%-7.91%-21.96%2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between KTEC and OBOR is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between KTEC and OBOR has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KTEC vs. OBOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KTEC
OBOR

Consumer Cyclical

43.0%
3.3%

Communication Services

30.4%
0.2%

Technology

24.7%
0.6%

Industrials

8.6%
25.5%

Healthcare

1.9%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

26.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

7.9%

Financial Services

-

23.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

KTEC
43.0%
OBOR
3.3%

Communication Services

KTEC
30.4%
OBOR
0.2%

Technology

KTEC
24.7%
OBOR
0.6%

Industrials

KTEC
8.6%
OBOR
25.5%

Healthcare

KTEC
1.9%
OBOR
0.2%

Basic Materials

KTEC

-

OBOR
26.2%

Consumer Defensive

KTEC

-

OBOR

-

Energy

KTEC

-

OBOR
7.9%

Financial Services

KTEC

-

OBOR
23.1%

Real Estate

KTEC

-

OBOR

-

Utilities

KTEC

-

OBOR
13.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KTEC vs. OBOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KTEC
KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

OBOR
OBOR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
OBOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
OBOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBOR Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KTEC vs. OBOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KTECOBORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.16

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

0.98

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

2.24

-2.90

KTEC vs. OBOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KTEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the OBOR Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KTEC and OBOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KTEC vs. OBOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, which is greater than OBOR's maximum drawdown of -41.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and OBOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTECOBORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.90%

-41.54%

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.49%

-14.95%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.49%

-18.06%

-18.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.08%

-34.00%

-26.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.48%

-10.06%

-34.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.06%

-15.90%

-28.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.61%

6.55%

+14.06%

Volatility

KTEC vs. OBOR - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) at 4.55%. This indicates that KTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OBOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTECOBORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

4.55%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.10%

14.28%

+5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.13%

17.05%

+11.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.61%

16.21%

+26.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.72%

18.51%

+24.21%

KTEC vs. OBOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than OBOR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

KTEC vs. OBOR - Dividend Comparison

KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than OBOR's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
3.81%3.36%0.27%0.81%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
1.90%1.94%3.87%3.40%4.75%3.26%2.04%4.33%0.02%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


KTEC and OBOR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KTEC has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to OBOR (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTEC dropped -66.90% vs OBOR's -41.54%.

On 5-year performance, OBOR leads with 0.54% vs -6.94% for KTEC. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, OBOR has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OBOR has performed better with a 0.54% return vs -6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OBOR.

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 1.90% for OBOR.

KTEC is categorized as China Equities, while OBOR is Emerging Markets Equities. KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while OBOR tracks MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 0.79% for OBOR.

OBOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KTEC and OBOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer