MCHI vs. EWI
MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) and EWI (iShares MSCI Italy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MCHI is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Index, while EWI is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Italy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MCHI returned 3.79%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for EWI. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWI.
Performance
MCHI vs. EWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -9.37% return, which is significantly lower than EWI's 12.50% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has underperformed EWI with an annualized return of 3.79%, while EWI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.29% annualized return.
MCHI
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- 6M
- -12.93%
- YTD
- -9.37%
- 1Y
- -4.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- -5.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.28%
EWI
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 29.57%
- 3Y*
- 26.26%
- 5Y*
- 17.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.51%
MCHI vs. EWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -9.37% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -23.01% | -21.74% | 27.78% | 23.72% | -19.79% | 54.67% |
EWI iShares MSCI Italy ETF | 12.50% | 55.72% | 10.23% | 30.63% | -14.16% | 14.38% | 1.69% | 26.98% | -17.18% | 28.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHI and EWI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MCHI and EWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
MCHI vs. EWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MCHI
EWI
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
MCHI
EWI
Communication Services
MCHI
EWI
Financial Services
MCHI
EWI
Technology
MCHI
EWI
-
Industrials
MCHI
EWI
Healthcare
MCHI
EWI
Basic Materials
MCHI
EWI
Energy
MCHI
EWI
Consumer Defensive
MCHI
EWI
Utilities
MCHI
EWI
Real Estate
MCHI
EWI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHI vs. EWI — Risk / Return Rank
MCHI
EWI
MCHI vs. EWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCHI | EWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.28 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 2.38 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 8.86 | -9.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCHI vs. EWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, smaller than the maximum EWI drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and EWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHI | EWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -70.38% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.22% | -12.48% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -16.80% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.66% | -35.25% | -18.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.95% | -43.00% | -19.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.20% | -1.96% | -36.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.64% | -28.83% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.78% | 3.35% | +7.43% |
Volatility
MCHI vs. EWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) at 3.97%. This indicates that MCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHI | EWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 3.97% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 15.51% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.64% | 18.38% | +2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.73% | 21.09% | +9.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.35% | 22.50% | +4.85% |
MCHI vs. EWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EWI's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCHI vs. EWI - Dividend Comparison
MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than EWI's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWI iShares MSCI Italy ETF | 3.13% | 2.80% | 4.07% | 3.40% | 4.57% | 2.63% | 1.66% | 3.80% | 4.71% | 2.19% | 3.64% | 2.31% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.03% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHI and EWI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCHI has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to EWI (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs EWI's -70.38%.
On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 14.29% vs 3.79% for MCHI. On fees, EWI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 14.29% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCHI.
EWI has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.03% for MCHI.
MCHI is categorized as China Equities, while EWI is Europe Equities. MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while EWI tracks MSCI Italy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 0.49% for EWI.
EWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCHI and EWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer