MCGFX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
MCGFX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Nov 2, 1994. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
MCGFX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCGFX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCGFX AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund | -1.92% | -19.12% | 14.37% | 34.16% | -27.05% | 25.78% | 31.91% | 32.61% | -1.47% | -0.89% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.81% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCGFX achieves a -1.92% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -9.81% return.
MCGFX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- YTD
- -1.92%
- 6M
- -31.52%
- 1Y
- -16.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.74%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCGFX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCGFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCGFX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
MCGFX
SWLGX
MCGFX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCGFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | 0.83 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 1.35 | -1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.19 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 1.17 | -1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 4.02 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCGFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | 0.83 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.58 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.70 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCGFX and SWLGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MCGFX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
MCGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCGFX AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.27% | 3.66% | 10.96% | 78.35% | 16.87% | 9.08% | 25.33% | 9.88% | 11.33% | 33.82% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MCGFX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCGFX drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCGFX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCGFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -32.69% | -12.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.89% | -16.16% | -19.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.89% | -32.69% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.49% | -13.03% | -20.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -7.13% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.27% | 4.69% | +11.58% |
Volatility
MCGFX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 6.73%. This indicates that MCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCGFX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 6.73% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.96% | 12.40% | +27.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.66% | 22.57% | +16.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 21.52% | +3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 22.81% | -0.47% |