MCGFX vs. SKSEX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MCGFX (AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund) and SKSEX (AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - MCGFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG, while SKSEX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, MCGFX returned 11.20%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for SKSEX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCGFX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for SKSEX.

Performance

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCGFX achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly lower than SKSEX's 24.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MCGFX has outperformed SKSEX with an annualized return of 11.20%, while SKSEX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.

MCGFX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 6.36%
• YTD: 18.18%
• 6M: 15.38%
• 1Y: -8.88%
• 3Y*: 7.25%
• 5Y*: 3.62%
• 10Y*: 11.20%

SKSEX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 24.85%
• 6M: 22.78%
• 1Y: 29.67%
• 3Y*: 15.05%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCGFX AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund	18.18%	-19.12%	14.37%	34.16%	-27.05%	25.78%	31.91%	32.61%	-1.47%	23.36%
SKSEX AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund	24.85%	-4.50%	10.60%	17.49%	-15.36%	33.22%	3.30%	38.26%	-18.98%	8.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MCGFX and SKSEX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 1994	0.69

The correlation between MCGFX and SKSEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MCGFX vs. SKSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCGFX

MCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2
MCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

SKSEX

SKSEX Risk / Return Rank: 42
SKSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
SKSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SKSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SKSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SKSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCGFX	SKSEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	1.61	-1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	2.13	-2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.30	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	2.94	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.40	8.19	-8.60

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCGFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the SKSEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCGFX and SKSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCGFX drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum SKSEX drawdown of -65.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCGFX and SKSEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCGFX	SKSEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.56%	-65.26%	+19.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.89%	-10.83%	-25.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.89%	-26.39%	-9.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.89%	-26.39%	-9.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.89%	-49.36%	+13.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.86%	0.00%	-19.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.68%	-9.22%	-1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.16%	3.87%	+16.29%

Volatility

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX) at 5.28%. This indicates that MCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCGFX	SKSEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.63%	5.28%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.79%	12.95%	+27.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.46%	19.76%	+16.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.29%	21.43%	+3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.53%	24.52%	-1.99%

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCGFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than SKSEX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MCGFX nor SKSEX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCGFX AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.27%	3.66%	10.96%	78.35%	16.87%	9.08%	25.33%	9.88%	11.33%	33.82%
SKSEX AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.62%	1.51%	1.69%	13.94%	43.15%	13.91%	14.98%	6.75%	0.02%	4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCGFX and SKSEX in my portfolio?

MCGFX and SKSEX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCGFX or SKSEX?

MCGFX has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to SKSEX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCGFX dropped -45.56% vs SKSEX's -65.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SKSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.