PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCGFX vs. SKSEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCGFX achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than SKSEX's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MCGFX has outperformed SKSEX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while SKSEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.


MCGFX

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.10%
YTD
11.11%
6M
-23.56%
1Y
-12.91%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
10.14%

SKSEX

1D
-0.53%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
16.87%
6M
9.02%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCGFX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund
11.11%-19.12%14.37%34.16%-27.05%25.78%31.91%32.61%-1.47%23.36%
SKSEX
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund
16.87%-4.50%10.60%17.49%-15.36%33.22%3.30%38.26%-18.98%8.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MCGFX and SKSEX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 1994

0.68

The correlation between MCGFX and SKSEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCGFX vs. SKSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCGFX
MCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SKSEX
SKSEX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SKSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SKSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCGFXSKSEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.35

1.25

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.17

1.70

-1.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.24

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

2.22

-2.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.69

6.22

-6.91

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCGFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the SKSEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCGFX and SKSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCGFXSKSEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

1.25

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.26

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.37

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Drawdowns

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCGFX drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum SKSEX drawdown of -65.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCGFX and SKSEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCGFXSKSEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-65.26%

+19.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.89%

-10.83%

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.89%

-26.39%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.89%

-26.39%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.89%

-49.36%

+13.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.66%

-2.83%

-21.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-9.23%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.43%

3.87%

+15.56%

Volatility

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX) at 5.15%. This indicates that MCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCGFXSKSEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

5.15%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.39%

15.62%

+24.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.03%

19.53%

+16.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.17%

21.47%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.45%

24.50%

-2.05%

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCGFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than SKSEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCGFX vs. SKSEX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MCGFX nor SKSEX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCGFX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%10.27%3.66%10.96%78.35%16.87%9.08%25.33%9.88%11.33%33.82%
SKSEX
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%8.62%1.51%1.69%13.94%43.15%13.91%14.98%6.75%0.02%4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCGFX and SKSEX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCGFX has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to SKSEX (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCGFX dropped -45.56% vs SKSEX's -65.26%.

SKSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCGFX and SKSEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer