PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCGFX vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCGFX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MCGFX having a 11.11% return and FXAIX slightly higher at 11.56%. Over the past 10 years, MCGFX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


MCGFX

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.10%
YTD
11.11%
6M
-23.56%
1Y
-12.91%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
10.14%

FXAIX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.94%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCGFX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCGFX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund
11.11%-19.12%14.37%34.16%-27.05%25.78%31.91%32.61%-1.47%23.36%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
11.56%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MCGFX and FXAIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.92

The correlation between MCGFX and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCGFX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCGFX
MCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCGFX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCGFXFXAIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.35

2.55

-2.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.17

3.46

-3.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.46

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

3.39

-3.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.69

15.86

-16.54

MCGFX vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCGFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCGFX and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCGFXFXAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

2.55

-2.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.84

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.87

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.82

-0.35

Drawdowns

MCGFX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCGFX drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCGFX and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCGFXFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-33.79%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.89%

-8.89%

-27.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.89%

-18.76%

-17.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.89%

-24.50%

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.89%

-33.79%

-2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.66%

0.00%

-24.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-3.79%

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.43%

1.90%

+17.53%

Volatility

MCGFX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 2.82%. This indicates that MCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCGFXFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

2.82%

+3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.39%

8.99%

+31.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.03%

11.88%

+24.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.17%

16.91%

+8.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.45%

18.07%

+4.38%

MCGFX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCGFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCGFX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

MCGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.03%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%
MCGFX
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%10.27%3.66%10.96%78.35%16.87%9.08%25.33%9.88%11.33%33.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCGFX and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCGFX has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to FXAIX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCGFX dropped -45.56% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCGFX and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer