PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MC.PA vs. ATD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MC.PA vs. ATD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MC.PA is traded in EUR, while ATD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATD.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MC.PA achieves a -19.55% return, which is significantly lower than ATD.TO's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MC.PA has outperformed ATD.TO with an annualized return of 16.10%, while ATD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.72% annualized return.


MC.PA

1D
3.53%
1M
10.80%
YTD
-19.55%
6M
-16.91%
1Y
13.44%
3Y*
-13.46%
5Y*
-3.38%
10Y*
16.10%

ATD.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
5.18%
YTD
12.24%
6M
17.09%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MC.PA vs. ATD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-19.55%3.93%-11.73%9.60%-4.76%43.83%24.66%63.17%7.31%37.90%
ATD.TO
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
12.24%-12.19%1.33%31.42%13.06%32.10%-0.49%31.28%0.64%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MC.PA and ATD.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MC.PA vs. ATD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MC.PA
MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ATD.TO
ATD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ATD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MC.PA vs. ATD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MC.PAATD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.11

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

1.12

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

2.09

-1.35

MC.PA vs. ATD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MC.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is comparable to the ATD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MC.PA and ATD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MC.PA vs. ATD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MC.PA drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, roughly equal to the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -56.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MC.PA and ATD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MC.PAATD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.74%

-56.60%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.65%

-12.00%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.87%

-28.15%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.03%

-28.15%

-20.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.03%

-36.85%

-12.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.02%

-9.75%

-29.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-10.43%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.58%

6.39%

+9.19%

Volatility

MC.PA vs. ATD.TO - Volatility Comparison

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) at 6.18%. This indicates that MC.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MC.PAATD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

6.18%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

18.26%

+3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.28%

26.07%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.90%

24.65%

+5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.93%

25.71%

+2.22%

Dividends

MC.PA vs. ATD.TO - Dividend Comparison

MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than ATD.TO's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATD.TO
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
0.97%1.07%0.90%0.76%0.79%0.70%0.69%1.06%1.15%1.09%1.00%0.72%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.55%2.02%2.05%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%

Financials

MC.PA vs. ATD.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MC.PA values in EUR, ATD.TO values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


MC.PA and ATD.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MC.PA and ATD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer