ATD.TO vs. L.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO).
Performance
ATD.TO vs. L.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATD.TO vs. L.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 5.48% | -4.91% | 3.11% | 32.26% | 13.21% | 22.84% | 5.88% | 22.54% | 3.57% | 6.48% |
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 2.44% | 32.54% | 50.14% | 9.65% | 18.16% | 70.07% | -3.01% | 13.23% | 14.59% | -2.20% |
Fundamentals
ATD.TO:
CA$72.90B
L.TO:
CA$75.34B
ATD.TO:
CA$2.89
L.TO:
CA$4.47
ATD.TO:
27.32
L.TO:
14.19
ATD.TO:
1.01
L.TO:
0.59
ATD.TO:
4.68
L.TO:
6.83
ATD.TO:
CA$73.29B
L.TO:
CA$63.90B
ATD.TO:
CA$13.89B
L.TO:
CA$19.99B
ATD.TO:
CA$6.26B
L.TO:
CA$7.20B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATD.TO achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than L.TO's 2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO has underperformed L.TO with an annualized return of 11.17%, while L.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.51% annualized return.
ATD.TO
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 12.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
L.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 18.36%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 31.77%
- 10Y*
- 18.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATD.TO vs. L.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ATD.TO
L.TO
ATD.TO vs. L.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATD.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 1.31 | -0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 1.83 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.74 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 6.23 | -3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATD.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 1.31 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 1.73 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 1.00 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.69 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between ATD.TO and L.TO is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ATD.TO vs. L.TO - Dividend Comparison
ATD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than L.TO's 0.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 1.04% | 1.07% | 0.90% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.61% | 0.57% | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.27% |
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 0.89% | 0.89% | 1.58% | 2.14% | 2.16% | 2.32% | 3.63% | 3.34% | 2.51% | 1.57% | 1.46% | 1.52% |
Drawdowns
ATD.TO vs. L.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than L.TO's maximum drawdown of -63.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATD.TO and L.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATD.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -63.24% | -36.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -10.64% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -13.81% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.61% | -20.23% | -12.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.89% | -8.22% | -91.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.30% | -14.87% | -64.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 4.68% | +0.64% |
Volatility
ATD.TO vs. L.TO - Volatility Comparison
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) at 5.71%. This indicates that ATD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATD.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.42% | 5.71% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.28% | 15.61% | +2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.97% | 20.79% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 18.47% | +4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 18.62% | +5.87% |
Financials
ATD.TO vs. L.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. and Loblaw Companies Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATD.TO vs. L.TO - Profitability Comparison
ATD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.24B and revenue of 21.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
L.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.32B and revenue of 15.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.5%.
ATD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
L.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 929.00M and revenue of 15.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
ATD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a net income of 757.20M and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
L.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 656.00M and revenue of 15.70B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.