ATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO).
Performance
ATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 5.48% | -4.91% | 3.11% | 32.26% | 13.21% | 22.84% | 5.88% | 22.54% | 3.57% | 6.48% |
BIP-UN.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P | 6.86% | 12.33% | 17.68% | 6.51% | -14.05% | 28.76% | 13.73% | 47.33% | -9.97% | 34.03% |
Fundamentals
ATD.TO:
CA$72.90B
BIP-UN.TO:
CA$23.09B
ATD.TO:
CA$2.89
BIP-UN.TO:
CA$1.15
ATD.TO:
27.32
BIP-UN.TO:
43.70
ATD.TO:
8.46
BIP-UN.TO:
0.23
ATD.TO:
1.01
BIP-UN.TO:
1.00
ATD.TO:
4.68
BIP-UN.TO:
4.72
ATD.TO:
CA$73.29B
BIP-UN.TO:
CA$23.10B
ATD.TO:
CA$13.89B
BIP-UN.TO:
CA$6.22B
ATD.TO:
CA$6.26B
BIP-UN.TO:
CA$11.01B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATD.TO achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than BIP-UN.TO's 6.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO has underperformed BIP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 11.17%, while BIP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.01% annualized return.
ATD.TO
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 12.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
BIP-UN.TO
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 25.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ATD.TO
BIP-UN.TO
ATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATD.TO | BIP-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 1.17 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 1.62 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.23 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.25 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 5.21 | -2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATD.TO | BIP-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 1.17 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.36 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.61 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | -1.11 | +1.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between ATD.TO and BIP-UN.TO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
ATD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than BIP-UN.TO's 6.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 1.04% | 1.07% | 0.90% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.61% | 0.57% | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.27% |
BIP-UN.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P | 6.66% | 7.01% | 6.74% | 6.92% | 6.21% | 4.61% | 5.86% | 6.32% | 7.93% | 6.14% | 6.97% | 7.97% |
Drawdowns
ATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATD.TO and BIP-UN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATD.TO | BIP-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -11.79% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -43.43% | +21.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.61% | -46.93% | +14.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.89% | -99.96% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.30% | -99.77% | +20.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 5.10% | +0.22% |
Volatility
ATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) at 8.63%. This indicates that ATD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATD.TO | BIP-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.42% | 8.63% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.28% | 13.43% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.97% | 22.07% | +3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 24.42% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 26.35% | -1.86% |
Financials
ATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATD.TO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison
ATD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.24B and revenue of 21.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.6%.
ATD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.69B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
ATD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a net income of 757.20M and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of 219.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.