PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBSF vs. SRLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MBSF vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MBSF vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MBSF
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
0.75%5.85%5.71%
SRLN
SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
-1.39%6.77%7.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSF achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than SRLN's -1.39% return.


MBSF

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.75%
6M
2.41%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SRLN

1D
0.20%
1M
1.56%
YTD
-1.39%
6M
0.39%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
4.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MBSF vs. SRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SRLN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MBSF vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBSF
MBSF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MBSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSF Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SRLN
SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBSF vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBSFSRLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

1.29

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.61

1.88

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.70

1.65

+5.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.07

5.85

+13.23

MBSF vs. SRLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the SRLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSF and SRLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBSFSRLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.29

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

0.68

+1.06

Correlation

The correlation between MBSF and SRLN is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MBSF vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison

MBSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than SRLN's 7.70% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBSF
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
4.63%4.71%4.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRLN
SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
7.70%7.67%8.58%8.44%5.72%4.45%4.91%5.39%4.98%4.01%3.94%4.43%

Drawdowns

MBSF vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSF drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum SRLN drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSF and SRLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MBSFSRLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-22.29%

+21.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.79%

-3.28%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-1.75%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-1.11%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.93%

-0.65%

Volatility

MBSF vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) is 1.42%, while SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) has a volatility of 1.78%. This indicates that MBSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MBSFSRLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.78%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

2.56%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

4.32%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.42%

3.89%

-0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.42%

6.05%

-2.63%