MBSF vs. LVLN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MBSF (Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF) and LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. MBSF is actively managed, while LVLN is passively managed. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MBSF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVLN.

Performance

MBSF vs. LVLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSF achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than LVLN's 1.57% return.

MBSF

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 1.88%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.74%

LVLN

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: 1.93%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF	$48.60K	$55.46K	$264.53K
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	$1.54M	$1.34M	$1.61M

MBSF vs. LVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	2.30%	0.95%
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF	1.57%	1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MBSF and LVLN is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

MBSF vs. LVLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MBSF

MBSF Risk / Return Rank: 85
MBSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MBSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
MBSF Omega Ratio Rank: 79
MBSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MBSF Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LVLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MBSF vs. LVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) and SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBSF	LVLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.25	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.49	—	—

Drawdowns

MBSF vs. LVLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSF drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, smaller than the maximum LVLN drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSF and LVLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBSF	LVLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-2.34%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.26%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-0.46%	+0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MBSF	LVLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85%	2.60%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.26%	2.60%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.26%	2.60%	+0.66%

MBSF vs. LVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LVLN's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBSF vs. LVLN - Dividend Comparison

MBSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than LVLN's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF	4.31%	0.49%	0.00%
MBSF Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF	4.43%	4.71%	4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBSF and LVLN in my portfolio?

MBSF and LVLN have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MBSF or LVLN?

On fees, LVLN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBSF or LVLN?

LVLN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBSF or LVLN?

MBSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 4.31% for LVLN.

What is the main difference between MBSF and LVLN?

They also come from different issuers: Regan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MBSF and 0.40% for LVLN.