MBS vs. CFIT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT).

MBS and CFIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MBS is an actively managed fund by Angel Oak. It was launched on Jun 4, 2021. CFIT is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Mar 27, 2025.

Performance

MBS vs. CFIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MBS vs. CFIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.52%	5.68%
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	0.16%	3.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBS achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than CFIT's 0.16% return.

MBS

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 5.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CFIT

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -2.74%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 0.17%
• 1Y: 3.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBS vs. CFIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CFIT's 0.71% expense ratio.

CFIT

Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF

MBS

Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF

Return for Risk

MBS vs. CFIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBS

MBS Risk / Return Rank: 74
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 58

CFIT

CFIT Risk / Return Rank: 28
CFIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CFIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CFIT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CFIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CFIT Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBS vs. CFIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MBS	CFIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	0.66	+0.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	0.93	+1.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.12	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	0.89	+1.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.13	2.12	+4.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MBS vs. CFIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the CFIT Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBS and CFIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBS	CFIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	0.66	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.68	0.69	+0.99

Correlation

The correlation between MBS and CFIT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MBS vs. CFIT - Dividend Comparison

MBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than CFIT's 4.31% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.46%	5.28%	4.52%
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	4.31%	3.14%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MBS vs. CFIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBS drawdown since its inception was -4.09%, roughly equal to the maximum CFIT drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBS and CFIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBS	CFIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-4.23%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-4.23%	+1.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-3.01%	+1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.00%	-1.32%	+0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	1.76%	-0.85%

Volatility

MBS vs. CFIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) is 1.03%, while Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that MBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBS	CFIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.03%	2.90%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.03%	4.46%	-2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	5.45%	-1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.08%	5.44%	-1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.08%	5.44%	-1.36%