MBCSX vs. MGFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) and MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX).
MBCSX is managed by MassMutual. It was launched on May 31, 2001. MGFAX is managed by MassMutual. It was launched on Dec 30, 2004.
Performance
MBCSX vs. MGFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MBCSX vs. MGFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBCSX MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund | -14.78% | 16.68% | 35.05% | 51.00% | -34.11% | 17.05% | 33.53% | 38.41% | 0.22% | 34.43% |
MGFAX MassMutual Global Fund | -13.50% | 14.37% | 15.01% | 33.87% | -32.08% | 19.60% | 27.18% | 30.67% | -14.19% | 35.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBCSX achieves a -14.78% return, which is significantly lower than MGFAX's -13.50% return. Over the past 10 years, MBCSX has outperformed MGFAX with an annualized return of 15.21%, while MGFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.
MBCSX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -9.17%
- YTD
- -14.78%
- 6M
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- 9.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
MGFAX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -10.60%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.23%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MBCSX vs. MGFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than MGFAX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MBCSX vs. MGFAX — Risk / Return Rank
MBCSX
MGFAX
MBCSX vs. MGFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) and MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MBCSX | MGFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 0.23 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.78 | 0.47 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.06 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 0.13 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 0.49 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBCSX | MGFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 0.23 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.13 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.36 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.28 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between MBCSX and MGFAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MBCSX vs. MGFAX - Dividend Comparison
MBCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.80%, which matches MGFAX's 50.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBCSX MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund | 50.80% | 43.29% | 13.12% | 23.06% | 18.44% | 21.93% | 4.59% | 11.06% | 6.70% | 4.00% | 4.77% | 18.85% |
MGFAX MassMutual Global Fund | 50.47% | 43.66% | 16.85% | 30.43% | 28.11% | 15.89% | 5.05% | 0.36% | 27.78% | 12.10% | 3.75% | 8.25% |
Drawdowns
MBCSX vs. MGFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBCSX drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, smaller than the maximum MGFAX drawdown of -62.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCSX and MGFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCSX | MGFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.66% | -62.06% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.47% | -16.38% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.37% | -46.09% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.37% | -46.09% | -2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.47% | -16.38% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.08% | -13.68% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 4.27% | +0.74% |
Volatility
MBCSX vs. MGFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) is 5.41%, while MassMutual Global Fund (MGFAX) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that MBCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MBCSX | MGFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 5.70% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 11.79% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 19.57% | +2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.76% | 33.39% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.53% | 27.51% | -1.98% |