MBCE vs. RPG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MBCE tracks the Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index while RPG tracks the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.

Performance

MBCE vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MBCE

• 1D: -4.74%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RPG

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 5.48%
• YTD: 30.31%
• 6M: 27.62%
• 1Y: 38.51%
• 3Y*: 27.72%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: 15.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCE vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF	-1.42%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MBCE and RPG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026	0.96

Return for Risk

MBCE vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 61
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCE vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBCE	RPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.37	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.49	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.16	—

Drawdowns

MBCE vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -7.04%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and RPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBCE	RPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.04%	-53.27%	+46.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.08%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.74%	-4.60%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-8.83%	+6.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.93%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MBCE	RPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.49%	22.09%	+27.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.49%	23.86%	+25.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.49%	22.90%	+26.59%

MBCE vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBCE vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.15%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBCE and RPG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, MBCE and RPG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MBCE or RPG?

On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBCE or RPG?

RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBCE or RPG?

RPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.

What is the main difference between MBCE and RPG?

MBCE tracks Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.35% for RPG.