PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBCE vs. RFDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBCE vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MBCE

1D
-1.43%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RFDA

1D
1.12%
1M
4.60%
YTD
12.65%
6M
13.45%
1Y
31.38%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCE vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


MBCE vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MBCE
RFDA

Technology

42.3%
19.9%

Healthcare

13.9%
8.8%

Financial Services

11.2%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
7.0%

Real Estate

7.6%
5.0%

Communication Services

7.1%
8.8%

Industrials

3.6%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
7.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Energy

-

12.5%

Utilities

-

5.0%

Technology

MBCE
42.3%
RFDA
19.9%

Healthcare

MBCE
13.9%
RFDA
8.8%

Financial Services

MBCE
11.2%
RFDA
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MBCE
10.9%
RFDA
7.0%

Real Estate

MBCE
7.6%
RFDA
5.0%

Communication Services

MBCE
7.1%
RFDA
8.8%

Industrials

MBCE
3.6%
RFDA
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

MBCE
3.5%
RFDA
7.6%

Basic Materials

MBCE

-

RFDA
1.8%

Energy

MBCE

-

RFDA
12.5%

Utilities

MBCE

-

RFDA
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBCE vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCE

RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCE vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MBCE vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBCERFDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

Drawdowns

MBCE vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -1.43%, smaller than the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and RFDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBCERFDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-34.60%

+33.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

0.00%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-3.74%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

Volatility

MBCE vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBCERFDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

MBCE vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBCE vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MBCE
Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
1.75%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, RFDA is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RFDA is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.

They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.52% for RFDA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBCE and RFDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer