MBCE vs. QUS
MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MBCE tracks the Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
MBCE vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCE
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
MBCE vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | -1.43% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 0.83% |
MBCE vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MBCE
QUS
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MBCE
QUS
Healthcare
MBCE
QUS
Financial Services
MBCE
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
MBCE
QUS
Real Estate
MBCE
QUS
Communication Services
MBCE
QUS
Industrials
MBCE
QUS
Consumer Defensive
MBCE
QUS
Basic Materials
MBCE
-
QUS
Energy
MBCE
-
QUS
Utilities
MBCE
-
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCE vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
MBCE
QUS
MBCE vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBCE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.78 | — |
Drawdowns
MBCE vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -1.43%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -33.78% | +32.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | 0.00% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -3.70% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility
MBCE vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.12% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.33% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.42% | — |
MBCE vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCE vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.30% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.
MBCE tracks Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.15% for QUS.
Find the right allocation for MBCE and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer