MBCE vs. IQM
MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MBCE is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.
Performance
MBCE vs. IQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCE
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQM
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 38.49%
- 6M
- 34.62%
- 1Y
- 72.20%
- 3Y*
- 37.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.93%
- 10Y*
- —
MBCE vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | -1.43% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | -1.20% |
MBCE vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MBCE
IQM
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MBCE
IQM
Healthcare
MBCE
IQM
Financial Services
MBCE
IQM
-
Consumer Cyclical
MBCE
IQM
Real Estate
MBCE
IQM
-
Communication Services
MBCE
IQM
Industrials
MBCE
IQM
Consumer Defensive
MBCE
IQM
-
Basic Materials
MBCE
-
IQM
-
Energy
MBCE
-
IQM
Utilities
MBCE
-
IQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCE vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank
MBCE
IQM
MBCE vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBCE | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.95 | — |
Drawdowns
MBCE vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -1.43%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and IQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCE | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -44.91% | +43.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -1.57% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -12.24% | +10.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility
MBCE vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCE | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 28.28% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 28.90% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 30.71% | — |
MBCE vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCE vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison
Neither MBCE nor IQM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% |
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.
MBCE and IQM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.50% for IQM.
Find the right allocation for MBCE and IQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer