MBCE vs. IQM

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MBCE is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.

Performance

MBCE vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MBCE

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 0.54%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IQM

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: -4.67%
• 6M: 16.81%
• YTD: 27.48%
• 1Y: 47.04%
• 3Y*: 30.36%
• 5Y*: 18.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBCE vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF	-0.76%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	-9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MBCE and IQM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026	0.97

Return for Risk

MBCE vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBCE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 57
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 47
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBCE vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MBCE	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.82	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.21	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.10	—

Drawdowns

MBCE vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -7.15%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBCE	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-44.91%	+37.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.71%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.70%	-11.52%	+5.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	-12.15%	+8.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MBCE	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.90%	33.72%	+9.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.90%	30.10%	+12.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.90%	31.38%	+11.52%

MBCE vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBCE vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

Neither MBCE nor IQM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBCE and IQM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, MBCE and IQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MBCE or IQM?

On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MBCE or IQM?

IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MBCE or IQM?

MBCE and IQM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MBCE and IQM?

They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.50% for IQM.