MBCC vs. BNO
MBCC (Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - MBCC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. MBCC charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
MBCC vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 6M
- 86.00%
- 1Y
- 91.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCC vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
MBCC
BNO
MBCC vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBCC | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.14 | — |
Drawdowns
MBCC vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCC | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -87.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -10.29% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -40.17% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.45% | — |
Volatility
MBCC vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCC | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 41.46% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 35.38% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 36.68% | — |
MBCC vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCC has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCC vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
Neither MBCC nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for MBCC.
MBCC and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MBCC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. MBCC tracks Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for MBCC and 0.90% for BNO.
Find the right allocation for MBCC and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer